Elite Schools

Elite schools yield elite results.

You can’t have elite schools and not expect elite results.

Elitism breeds elitism.

Of course it does. How could it be any other way?

If you send children to elite schools and then tell them that they are elite, they are going to prosecute their elitism.

They are going to award themselves large salaries.

They are going to rig the game so that they make billions of dollars.

They are going to polarize wealth.

Eventually, they will develop contempt for regular people.

They will lose all sense of noblesse oblige.

The result is what you see before you today in the United States.

It’s not rocket science.

If you send your children to elite schools, you will get elite results.

Your childrenwill lose the values that you impart into them and gain the values that the elite schools instill within them.

When they attend an elite school, they are joining a cult.

It is the cult of the best and brightest.

There at those elite schools they will meet important people. They will meet Brad Pitt. They will meet Tom Cruise. They will meet Tom Hanks. They will meet the captains of industry.

It is only natural that they will ask themselves. Why are they meeting these people and other people are not.

Well, the answer is because that’s the way the schools have things set up. It’s a cult, and they are indoctrinating your children to think of themselves as elites.

But that’s not what your child will conclude.

Your child will conclude that he is a cut above other people, that he or she is an elite.

Then, after many years, they will prosecute that vision ruthlessly upon the people.

They will increasingly not listen to other people.

Why should they? They are the elites. They are the smartest guys in the room.

They will then continue to perpetuate the beliefs of their cult in the media.

They will continue to make movies in which every genius is a Harvard or MIT graduate disregarding the fact that Albert Einstein went to a third-tier university, that Steve Jobs went to Reed College, and that Thomas Edison was homeschooled by his mother.

If they are in a position of power within the radio and television industry, they will subconsciously select members of their own cult to be the principal broadcasters.

Those biased radio and television broadcasters will never seriously point out the flaws of members of their own cult.

They will gloss over their mistakes. They will call them mistakes that anybody would have made. They will call them unforeseen mistakes.

If there is a scandal involving those elites, they will do a limbo dance and a French minuet around the truth.

The result will be that these elite leaders will never be held accountable. They will always escape justice.

The result will be a calamity for you.

More dangerous than that, though is that these broadcasters, by favoring graduates of elite schools, will slowly indoctrinate you into thinking that these people are the best and brightest.

The results will suggest otherwise.

This is where we stand in the United States of America.

We have leaders overwhelmingly from elite schools, who have been ruling us for the last 70 years.

They’ve created problems that are unbelievable.

You couldn’t imagine these problems when I was a boy just 60 years ago.

But here we are with runaway homelessness, runaway addiction, school shootings every day. massive polarization of wealth, teen, suicides, escalating, uncontrollable immigration on our southern border.

And yet, in all of this, no one in the main stream media has seriously asked the question: maybe our elite leaders don’t have the right stuff. Maybe we need to have regular people try to solve the problem.

Think about it.

We live in a Kim Jong-un society with infallible leaders.

They can do no wrong, yet society is collapsing about them.

So what do we do? What is the solution?

We must take the long term solution which paradoxically will be the short term solution.

We must withdraw our support from these elite schools.

We must shut them down.

The best way to shut them down is to not send our children to these schools.

The individual, not the school, must reign supreme.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Conspiracies, Accountability, and Thresholds

I do believe that there is a conspiracy in the United States that works to keep us down.

But it’s not a conspiracy in the way we think of conspiracies.

It’s not hidden.

It’s right there out in the open for everyone to see.

And you too can be a member of that conspiracy.

Our elites are always looking for a few good men. They don’t care about your religious denomination, your skin color, or where you come from.

Join up!

This open elite conspiracy not only does not hide, they openly publish their intentions and thought processes in their various publications.

Foreign Affairs is one such publication. There are many others.

The thing is this, you can’t actually point to any one specific person, or organization, and say: Aha! That’s the one guy who is leading the conspiracy.

It doesn’t work like that.

These participants in this conspiracy work like the cells in your brain.

They store information, they communicate information.

They communicate information through their various think tanks, organizations, social organizations, trade meetings, and so forth.

Just as the cells of your brain have no particular leader, so does this open conspiracy have no one particular leader.

Who are you as a person? What one cell in your brain is the leader?

It’s not easy to point to any one cell, because there is no cell that is the leader.

And yet there is definitely a “you” within your body that does make decisions.

How does this come about?

Out of the communication between the cells of your body a consensus is formed, and that consensus is you.

The same goes for the open conspiracy that rules the United States.

This open conspiracy has a good side, and it has a bad side.

We can use the metaphor of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Or we can use the metaphor expressed in the Life of Pi.

Pi is obviously Dr. Jekyll.

Richard Parker, the tiger, is the brutal beast that lives within us. He is Mr. Hyde.

The two are strangers in the night. They don’t know each other, but they are vaguely aware of each other’s existence.

Richard Parker is a beast as is Mr. Hyde.

They will ruthlessly kill in order to survive. They are not moral creatures, nor do they have qualms.

When survival is necessary or perceived to be necessary, Richard Parker will appear as will Mr. Hyde. They will do what they have to do and then walk away without looking back.

This is so for us as individual human beings, and it is so for our country.

In a sense, we are all part of not only Dr. Jekyll, but Mr. Hyde as well.

We all contribute to the dark side of our national character, even though we may not want to admit it. We just contribute to varying degrees.

We bury our dark deeds and even darker desires. We allow Richard Parker to go back into the jungle.

On the national stage, Richard Parker and Mr. Hyde are best represented by the dark intelligence forces that we don’t want to talk about too much.

That would be the CIA.

Dr. Jekyll on the national stage is a congenial individual who smiles, partakes of wine and Brie at cocktail parties, dresses up in a nice suit , and waxes eloquently about the nobility of our Constitution.

Dr. Jekyll is not anyone particular individual but coalition of all the positive thoughts we have about the world and ourselves.

Standing next to him, often hidden from view, is Mr. Hyde. He is a coalition of all the negative thoughts we have about the world and ourselves

Mr. Hyde is generally a frightened creature who operates out of survival.

He will kill ruthlessly when he feels threatened.

In the national discussion of events, we debate openly what is best for us and our survival. A consensus results which produces both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde along with Pi and Richard Parker.

If we ourselves are governed by fear and distrust, Mr. Hyde and Richard Parker will prevail.

They will do what they have to do.

The result will be endless war, endless homelessness, endless violence, and endless subjugation of the American people.

The dark side will be hidden from us as Richard Parker disappears into the thick jungle.

We prefer not to know too much and ask too many questions about Mr. Hyde or Richard Parker.

We don’t want to know about our dirty secrets and the dark side of our humanity.

That part of us is deeply buried.

We make up lovely stories to shield ourselves from pain.

We Americans tell ourselves myths such as:

America is always the good guy. America is a positive force for the world. America needs to tame the barbarian beast. Americans have it better than other cultures of the world. The reason other countries are weak is because their people are corrupt and intellectually weak. It is America’s destiny to control the world.

These are the lies we tell ourselves to sanitize our dirty deeds.

It would be too much pain for Dr. Jekyll to realize that he is Dr. Hyde after all.


When a consensus of what to do is formed through various think tanks and organizations, the body politic implements solutions.

If these solutions do not work, another consensus of what to do is formed, and the body politic, or the consensus hands the problem off to Mr. Hyde, in this case, the CIA.

Just do it! Mr. Hyde is instructed. Just get it done!

Don’t tell us the details.

For a brief fleeting second, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde meet each other, but not in a brightly lit place where they can get to know each other.

Dr. Jekyll is not wanting to get his hands dirty, and Mr. Hyde is too afraid to come out in the light.


When does your brain move into action? When does it send out impulses to the muscles of the legs?

What cell makes that decision?

When you want to get up in the morning, but instead lay there for a while, who or what cell makes that decision for you to suddenly kick your legs up in the air and get up?

There is no one cell. It’s a cumulative effect from many cells that must surpass a threshold, after which you biologically move into an action.

Suddenly your up and moving.

That is how conspiracies work. Yes, of course, there are people who have to tell people to do things, but it’s not as if those people thought the idea up on their own. They have to be impacted by many other people.


In the case of John Kennedy, many of his critics discussed openly with their friends and their dissatisfaction with him.

Gradually, a consensus grew within the various business communities, the mob, the importers, the greedy pigs at Freeport Sulphur, the people from Israel, and so forth that Kennedy had to go.

The consensus grew to a critical level, that information was listened to by Allen Dulles and his top men at the CIA.

How did they know when to spring into action?

The same way you spring into action when you get up in the morning

A critical threshold, was surpassed.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Awards Shows

What do you get out of an awards show?

Suppose I told you that award shows aren’t for you, but for the elites. What would you say?

It’s true. Awards shows exist for the elites to control you.

Here’s how it’s done.

Awards shows gradually inculcate people into a superstar culture where you invest your ego into the superstar.

The superstar then becomes a demigod, a tool of the elites, a valuable social influencer to move you into the cattle pens of opinion that our elites will decide for you whether that be war, or lockdowns.

As the elites are setting up these awards shows, as they are implementing Savior Syndrome through their monotonous superhero movies, as they are strapping the American family financially, they are creating a sense of helplessness, dependence and despair within the American worker.

That American worker gradually becomes dependent upon the elites.

They begin to invest their own self-worth into the superstar – not themselves.

Self-reliance and confidence is lost.

When the superstar wins an award, they win; when the superstar loses, they lose.

The masses who are indoctrinated into this nonsense then become putty in the hands of the elites.

When the next pandemic hits, the superstar – within whom the masses have invested their ego – will then call for social distancing, flattening the curve, and staying at home.

Which the masses will faithfully engage in.

They don’t understand why they’re doing it, but they will do it

By staying at home, by socially distancing, they work against small businesses – who can’t possibly comply with the nonsensical restrictions that Corporate America – and their college chums in government – have imposed upon the population.

Many of the small businesses will shut down; this will be good for the big corporations. Now, even more people will go to Olive Garden.

Big corporations never have to worry because they will receive infinite bailouts. Too big to fail, ya know.

This will edge our society further toward a more centralized, oligarchy-controlled economy, which is not good for you.

Basically, it’s fascism.

This will mean less flexibility for the country.

It will mean fewer choices.

It will result in shortages like we see now.

These award shows are not an accident.

There are part of a greater plan.

What do you get out of it anyway when Taylor Swift wins an award?

What does that do for you?

Does someone put a thousand bucks into your bank account?

You get nothing out of it except a cheap and fleeting vicarious thrill.

What do you lose? Your well-paying job, your kids to drugs, and your dignity,

Think about it.

Knowing this, leads us to understand what we have to do when we take these Ivy League pagans out of power.

No awards shows.

No awards. Period.

My gosh, how many of these awards ceremonies do we need? They are ubiquitous.

No superhero movies. Good, they are terrible anyway. There is a lot of bling, lots of side shots of teams of superstars walking forward in slow motion, lots of chaotic fighting – and not one brain cell’s worth of creative plot.

No celebrity activists. Double good. We don’t want poorly informed celebrity activists (woke puppets of the fascist agenda ) influencing our elected representatives. That’s why we have elections. Our leaders are supposed to listen to us, not to celebrity activists, like Jay Z. (If you will remember, during the George Floyd riots, the starstruck mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, took time out of his busy day to listen to that noted sociologist – Jay Z.

No social influencing.

An actor can make his movie, then disappear into a quiet life – just like everyone else.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Dark Forces

I think it’s only reasonable to explain how conspiracies exist.

Let me try to be a little bit more clear.

How is it possible for so many people to be involved in a conspiracy?

Somebody would talk, right?

Not if they don’t know that there is a conspiracy.

Every ruling oligarchy is ruled by an oligarchy that is ruled by an oligarchy. There is always an inner circle. In the Soviet Union the top of the inner circle was Joe Stalin.

He knew what was going to happen because he was the guy with the guns.

The United States is no different.

The guys at the top don’t always need to tell the truth to the people beneath them.

And it’s always possible to project a smiley face reason for why you are doing things.

Evil people almost never tell the real reason.

Many times the real reason is that the person on top wants to make a pile of money.

Since that won’t sell to people, a smiley face reason is offered.

If anybody should ask too many questions, a bribe can be offered in the form of more money. If the individual still won’t comply, they can be executed or put in a prison shut away from everybody.

Since everyone in the oligarchy benefits to some degree, not too many questions are asked.

It’s easier to not know the truth.

Remember, these members of the oligarchy, only want to be enriched.

They love money.

That’s why the vast majority of the oligarchy’s members went into politics. Now, if they went into politics in order to do noble things, they can be persuaded to think differently by the huge amount of money to be made there.

Never underestimate the power of money to open one’s eyes to new vistas and ways of thinking.

Before we go to much further, let’s see if we can use an example.

Let’s look at the invasions of various countries in the Middle East.

Where did these ideas come from.

They came from a heart of darkness.

They were envisioned by the top leadership of the oligarchy within the oligarchy of the United States.

I’m not talking about political leaders; I’m not talking about heads of corporations.

I’m talking about the ideas that float above them.

All these leaders of the oligarchy get together, and discuss issues within various think tanks and discussion groups. These exist within associations, foundations, academic organizations, social organizations and so on.

Over time a consensus is formed. The consensus and the thoughts live above us on a metaphysical plane.

There is no one person that you can point to that is the originator of the consensus.

Nevertheless, the consensus is a real thing.

In the case of the countries of the Middle East, the consensus states that these countries must be invaded in order to balkanize the Middle East. The consensus is unhappy with the current arrangement, because the consensus does not want to see a Middle Eastern state becomes so strong that it can escape US influence.

The consensus concludes that Saddam Hussein must go, that Assad in Syria must go, that Qaddafi in Libya must go.

The consensus, to protect its own sanity, hands off the mission to the CIA (it’s thug agency that works for them, not the American people) and says: Do it! Don’t tell me the details.

The CIA, which is a puppet and a pawn of the ruling elite, does just that.

The CIA can do this because they it is an organization not open to the public. And because the CIA is a thug organization, it can kill with impunity. Nobody within the CIA is going to talk because they are going to be executed if they do.

Not to worry though, because a smiley face will always be placed upon their deeds.

We are not over there to kill and to take over their assets. We were there to encourage democracy and freedom.

We are there to export our beautiful democracy.

Saddam Hussein is a bad guy who kills his own citizens. The fact that we put him there matters not at all.

We will just push to the darkest corners of our mind the pictures of Rummy and Bush shaking hands with Saddam.

To embellish our nobility, we will call this uprising that we promote in the Middle East (after 2010) the Arab Spring.

The term is of course Orwellian as no such Spring took place at all.

In reality, millions of citizens of the Middle East perished.

The CIA is critical in prosecuting these horrors.


What is the CIA?

Why does it exist?

What is the CIA‘s role in this world?

The CIA exists to acquire, store, maintain, manipulate, and disperse information.

We may think that the CIA is a cloak and dagger industry.

Yes, it is, but that is not its main function.

It’s primary preoccupation is information.

Knowing this helps you understand why the CIA has engaged in many of its activities such as MKUltra.

The acquisition of information. This involves not only traditional cloak and dagger activities, but also the use of drugs to extract information from people, and the torturing of people to acquire information.

The manipulation of information. This includes disinformation campaigns, propaganda campaigns, memory insertion programs.

The dispersal of information. This includes the insertion of CIA agents into news rooms, and the placement of former CIA agents into the media, people like William F Buckley and Tom Braden.

As you can see, our federal government, a Nazi regime to the core, spends a lot of time and concern with information.

The CIA has evolved into a hybrid of Nazi Germany’s SD (Sicherheitdienst), its Propaganda Ministry (Goebbels), and it’s Gestapo.

Dark forces exist there.


I hope this helps explain to some degree what is going on and how can no one be identified as members of the cabal.

In many respects, it’s similar to the story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Dr. Jekyll is the good guy, and Mr. Hyde is the bad guy, the dark force in our inner self.

The two men live within one body.

The bad guy comes out at night. The good guy comes out in the morning. They do not know each other. They have never met.

One is the smiley face, the other is the angry face.

One is civilized, the other is uncivilized and amoral.

They represent the good and evil forces of humanity.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

AI and Implementation

Why will AI never be fully implemented?

AI takes all the information that exists in the past and uses that information to solve problems.

Given that, AI should be able to look at historical world events for the past several thousands of years, combine that data with its knowledge of the root causes of war, and then develop a course of action to prevent world war.

Theoretically, then, we should have less war in the future.

This will never happen.

There isn’t an ice cube’s chance in hot coffee that AI will be implemented nor work in that situation.

Governments that are controlled by the wealthy pig elite will never use AI for this purpose.

Why would they do that?

If anyone tries to implement a methodology, which would promote peace based upon AI, that person will be slaughtered on the spot.

All sorts of excuses will be made as to why we are not implementing AI for this specific purpose.

As to why, we are not implementing AI for the prevention of war, that will never be discussed.

Every attempt to implement AI for the prevention of war will be stalled.

Flimsy excuses will be offered as to why it’s not being implemented.

Finally, tragically, the implementation of AI will be attempted weakly decade after decade – with many poor Band-Aids.

This is akin to the half-hearted, impotent measures our elites attempt in trying to reform voting.

Fixing our corrupt voting system is recognized as something that needs to be done but is never accomplished.

How is it possible for the bank to keep track of all your banking data with complete precision, and yet somehow we can’t employ that in voting.

I’ve had banking and credit card accounts, and all sorts of financial accounts, which include notes and loans.

Everyone of these banks covering hundreds of thousands of transactions for me personally has never been inaccurate by so much as a penny.

I imagine your experience is the same.

So why can’t we apply the technology and security of the online banking system with voting.

Because the politicians want corrupt voting.

They need that corrupt voting in order to steal elections so as to put their Harvard motherfuckers in power.

Similarly, AI will never be fully enabled to prevent war.

Consequently, it will never work.

It will never work because there’s too much money at stake.

Our elites are robbing trillions from the American citizen.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Are Harvard Guys the Smartest Guys in the Room?

Why Harvard does not graduate “the best and the brightest”,

Why does Harvard not graduate the smartest guys in the room?

The basis of “the best and the brightest” are the ridiculous GPA and SAT scores.

Harvard principally selects valedictorians and salutatorians.

Of course they select the worthless rich and the novelty acts – the transgendered Taliban.

But for the most part, they accept people who have the highest GPAs and SAT scores.

It’s all very Germanic.

Deutschland, Deutschland, Uberalle. 🎶

There appears to be some logic in this, correct?

Not really.

There are a lot of faulty assumptions behind this selection process.

Les examine these faulty assumptions..

I think I’ll just list them. Most of them are laughably obvious.

It assumes the following:

1. That everyone knows that such a ridiculous competition – being number one – exists.

2. That everyone cares about such a ridiculous competition.

3. That everyone accepts and believes that a higher GPA or SAT score makes for a more enlightened and smarter person. What happens if you personally believe that awards, and being number one, are immoral and inconsistent with Christianity? If Jesus refused a crown, why is that not good enough for us?

4. That the competitors, whether they cared or not, are able to care at maximum level. What about those children who are undergoing tremendous family strife? When I was in high school I wasn’t trying to be number one, I was trying to survive family trauma. I barely tried at all – and still I finished 51 in my class out of 650 people.

5. That, of the people who are in the contest, everyone receives the right mentor to guide them. I can honestly say that I had no real mentoring at all. Attending Harvard or Yale wasn’t even close to being on the radar.

6. That of those people in the contest, their parents, imparted values that prized the Ivy League. Although my father (he died when I was 13) attended the Unuversiy of Pennsylvania medical school, and my grandfather attended Cornell, my mother didn’t know anything about the higher educational system within the context of the living joke that it was, and is today. Furthermore, she thought Ivy League people were snobs. (Surprise! They are, and the joke is on you.)

7. That the people in the contest can afford to go Harvard.

8. That the people in the contest can go there. Richard Nixon was accepted into Harvard, but was not able to go. He had to work his family store because his father had suffered an illness. Now, as it turns out, it might have been a good thing for Nixon to have attended Harvard. While there, he may have even met up with Ben “Fuck-bitch” Bradlee, the destroyer of the Constitution. Perhaps Richard Nixon could’ve knocked some of the arrogance and strut out of him. Unfortunately, Nixon was a Quaker. That was too bad for us and equally bad for the Constitution. Ben Bradlee later ended up at the CIA controlled Washington Post where he was able to trash, qualified people – that would be any one who cared for regular people instead of the crummy, treacherous Boston Brahmin class of scum who oozed out of those twin cesspools in Cambridge and Beacon Hill.

9. That being a valedictorian and salutatorian at the tender age of 17 is reflective of a persons level of morality. Are the two directly proportional?

10. That the high GPA and high SAT score are directly proportional to a higher state of morality.

11. That all the competitors have the oily glibness and fake hyper-maturity that Harvard prizes. What if you don’t value skillful lying? What if you’re not a con man? What if you don’t care about being a buzzword artist?

12. What if you have moral objections to the criminal elite who populate Harvard?

13. That being precocious, before one has developed a real experience in the world, is a good thing for the Harvard graduate and for society at large? Is it not possible that Harvard is selecting these people not because they are the best and the brightest, but because they are smart but weak people who are putty in the hands of the immoral elite

14. Brain speed, which is equivalent to IQ, is a function of the brain that is not directly correlated to separating the wheat from the chaff.

In fact, the two functions are inversely proportional to each other.

I analogize brain speed to a car’s ability to move quickly down the road.

I analogize separating the wheat from the chaff to a driver’s ability to see clearly peripherally.

Everyone knows that as you move more quickly down the road, you lose context, peripherally.

Consequently, high IQ people are more unable to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Okay, so why can’t highly intelligent people just slow down their brain.

They can’t.

Unlike the car, a persons, intelligence or brain speed cannot accelerate or decelerate. Your brain always moves at 250 mph, or it doesn’t move at 250 mph.

I’m sure you can think of a few more.

Thank you Harvard for imposing your pagan value system on society.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Necessity of the Oligarchy

About a year ago, I was ranting and raving to my friend Garry about the Harvard oligarchy that is running the United States.

Garry feebly defended the oligarchy by stating that every civilization has an oligarchy.

That may be true, I responded, but this oligarchy has no sense of noblesse oblige.

An oligarchy that has no sense of noblesse oblige feathers its own nest and engages in tyranny upon the rest of the people.

Nevertheless, Garry’s comment spurred me to think about whether the Harvard oligarchy is necessary to the United States of America.

Do we need the Harvard oligarchy (and by extension the Harvard graduate)? Let’s face it, Harvard exists to train the officers of Corporate America. Harvard does not exist to train, pipefitters and bricklayers.

So, do we need any oligarchy? Do we need the Harvard graduate?

Can a country function without an oligarchy?

I believe so, and that is the purpose of this discussion.

This discussion may be somewhat rambling, but I will begin with Sarah Palin.

Back in 2008, Sir Colin Powell got on television and told us that Sarah Palin was unequivocally unqualified to be President of the United States should John McCain be elected and then die in office.

Amazingly, Sir Colin said nothing when Kamala Harris was running for vice-President, and yes, Colin Powell was still alive and capable of contributing an opinion.

Back in 2008, I was enraged when Colin Powell made that assessment. Not only did I think she was qualified, I thought she was more qualified than Barack Obama.

Sarah Palin was not only the mayor of Willow, Alaska, she was also the governor of Alaska.

As the years went by though I realized that Sir Colin was correct: Sarah Palin was unequivocally unqualified to be President of the United States – within the context of America being an empire, within the context of the America that Sir Colin imagined for us.

But that is the point.

Sarah Palin is unequivocally qualified to be President of the United States within the context of America being the Republic that we the regular people envision.

And within that context, Barack Obama was unequivocally unqualified to be the President of the United States.

He had no managerial skills whatsoever. He had always been a professor, or a senator or representative. Being a representative is not the same thing as being a governor or mayor.

Believe it or not, I have heard the argument in favor of Barack Obama that he was running his staff at his congressional office.

Please, don’t make me laugh.

Do you get it Barack Obama?

Do you get it Sir Colin living in the afterlife?

We don’t share the same vision that you do for America.

Let me be clear: we don’t believe in America the Empire. We believe in America the Republic. Furthermore, we believe that you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Sarah Palin is unequivocally qualified to run America the Republic.

America the Republic doesn’t need Ivy League trained lawyer tricksters to fuck people out of their money and dignity.

America the Republic doesn’t wage war around the globe so that Ivy League self-servers can loot billions of dollars from the national treasury.

America the Republic doesn’t believe in exploitation.

America the Republic believes in a small limited government that works for the people of the United States and no one else.

America the Republic believes that the bills that are pushed through Congress should be specific, to the point, and written on one page of paper.

There are no omnibus bills.

In fact, America the Republic believes in the block grant system that Richard Nixon tried to introduce in which the massive federal bureaucracy can be replaced by the local bureaucracy that is more apt in making decisions for the specific needs of the people who live in that locality.

This was opposed by congressional hacks, who wanted to be able to pompously proclaim to their citizens that they were the ones who brought the new VA hospital to their locality. Having local politicians make those decisions would cut the congressional fuckhead out of his or her glory.

Assigning block grants is the way to go. The bills become simpler and more manageable. You don’t need to write an omnibus bill that creates tens of thousands of goodies and pork.

In this manner, Congressman can read and decipher the bill unlike today where bills are 3000 page dinosaurs that are chock-filled with secret back room deals.

America the Republic believes in a level playing field between big corporations and small individuals.

America the Republic does not permit corporations to lobby – because a corporation is not a person.

Individuals may lobby, but never a corporation.

Similarly, corporate heads can be sued for the malfeasance of the corporation.

And, corporations can be shut down, regardless of their size if persistent malfeasance is noted.

Adios, Jamie Dimon.

A corporation is not a person. It is not a person because a person generally dies after 80 years of age. Corporations on the other hand may live for hundreds of years.

Furthermore, a corporation has no sense of shame.

People have a sense of shame. As such, they fear ostracism from society when they are caught committing malfeasance.a corporation never feel fears ostracism from society because they have no sense of shame.

Legally, an individual who commits malfeasance is sent to jail. If the individual cries before the judge that this will adversely affect his family, the judge says the same thing to you, rightfully, that your parents said to you when they punched you as a child. They said to you: You should’ve thought of that before you committed the crime.

The modern day judge never has the guts to shut down the corporation . Instead a fine is deemed satisfactory, and this is looked upon as a good thing. by the pussy cat-lackeys on CNBC.

America the Republic sticks up for the small guy.

America the Republic embraces the words of Ayn Rand in her novel Anthem.

That novel embraces the supremacy of individual freedom.

America the Republic does not believe in rigid orthodoxies.

America the Republic does not play favorites.

Harvard and other Ivy League institutions are the antithesis of Anthem.

Harvard believes in elite classes of people who populate our oligarchy. They will make the decisions, and political correctness ushered in by the Harvard Cartel’s lackey Bill Clinton, Harvard graduate, now mandates people to obey.

Harvard will limit your speech.

In doing so, Harvard opposes everything that the Founding Fathers believed in.

Free speech is free speech. Politically correct speech is limited in speech.

Limited speech is what the Harvard oppressor believes in.

So, in summary, is the Harvard graduate necessary?


Indeed, the Harvard graduate is ruinous to the American dream.

The Founding Fathers distrusted corporations.

They limited their scope, and the number of years within which they could operate. The chief operating officers of the corporation could be sued.

The Founding Fathers did not come exclusively from Harvard University. In fact, the principal heroes of the American republic graduated from other institutions.

Nowadays non-Ivy League graduates are dismissed from being eligible for the Supreme Court. They are branded as intellectual lightweights.

Arlen Specter, the bagman for the ruling elite, the man who came up with a magic bullet theory for the Kennedy assassination, admitted as much in so many words when he voted to dismiss Harriet Meyers, and appointee by George Bush, 43.

As recently as 1949-1050, only five years before I was born, there existed a healthy mix of non-Harvard graduates on the Supreme Court.

Why, however, did we survive?

Increasingly, the Harvard cartel has put its death grip on the machinery of our government.

This is not a good thing.

The Harvard graduate has proved himself to be clearly an elitist who wages war against other cultures of the world.

Other cultures are just as valuable, and just as valid as is ours.

It is not our job to export our beautiful democracy – which is in reality a shamocracy – to the barbarian beast.

These, Ivy League bozos, lead by Harvard University, have no respect for other countries,

Moreover, they have no respect for us an individuals; after all, they are living Gods.

The problem is this: People who ride high on their horse get knocked off.

We are paying now for Harvard, and we will pay extensively for Harvard arrogance if their reign of terror and tyranny is allowed to continue.

So, is the Harvard graduate necessary?

Unequivocally not.

These arrogant, clueless buffoons will lead us to our ruination.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Not Wanting To Know

It’s important to explain why collective punishment is necessary for Harvard University and all its graduates.

I can easily see where some of you might think that there are good Harvard graduates, and that it’s unfair to punish all Harvard graduates for the crimes of a few.

If you think that, you are wrong.

I’m not going to mince words, or try to convince with softening statements. I’m not going to sneakily try to nudge you over to my way of thinking.

I’m not going to say, “Hey, I can see your point of view, but have you ever thought of this?”

In short, the good Harvard graduate acts as the smiley face for the evil Harvard graduates who are doing great harm to the United States of America and the world.

It doesn’t matter if they are unwitting bedfellows.

It is the good Harvard graduate who acts as a shield for the bad ones.

It doesn’t matter if they don’t know that they are being used.

The crime of the German people was not that they knew that the Nazis were slaughtering the Jews. The crime of the German people was that they did not want to know.

The German people actively shut their eyes to the possibility of what was happening.

They did not want to know.

By their willing and active silence, they validated the Nazi regime.

The same goes for the good Harvard graduate.

You don’t need a degree from Harvard, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist, to see that the Harvard Cartel is in charge of the United States.

You can see clearly the effects of the poor leadership of the Harvard Cartel.

You can see the runaway homelessness, the nonstop war, the rampant drug abuse, the runaway immigration, the destruction of the black community, the mass shootings, and many other problems.

These problems have been with us, and growing, for sometime now.

These problems are not recent events that have sprung up within the last two years.

You would have to be brain-dead to not conclude that if the Harvard Cartel cannot solve these problems, it is because they do not want to solve these problems.

The Cartel, supposedly comprised of intelligent people, dance around the issues while applying ineffective Band-Aids.

They have applied these Band-Aids in different disguises for decades. Their solutions never address the core problem.

The core problem is the economic disempowerment that the Harvard Cartel engineered against local communities across the nation.

In a nutshell, well-paying jobs were replaced with low-paying jobs through outsourcing.

When the American family is economically compromised, all sorts of social, ills, arise: divorce, physical abuse, child, abuse, sexual abuse, mental problems, vandalism, crime, rampant, drug abuse.

Solving the problem would reverse the engine and take money away from the Harvard Cartel.

That’s right, these problems serve the monetary and political interests of the Harvard Cartel.

The good Harvard graduate does not want to recognize this.

He does not even want to entertain the possibility that there is an evil segment coming out of the Harvard University that is responsible for these problems.

Now, everything that I say, here applies to the other Ivy League institutions and those institutions in the new Ivy League which have gained Ivy status.

Remember, you don’t have to be a graduate of Harvard to be in the Harvard Cartel. It’s called the Harvard Cartel because Harvard is the spiritual leader of the the Harvard Cartel and by extension Criminal Corporate America.

Criminal Corporate America – which includes our major corporations, Congress, the presidency, the Supreme Court, major foundations, associations, NGOs, sports leagues, major media, radio, television, movies, print media – is heavily populated at the upper levels by members of the Harvard Cartel and its members who are principally, but not solely, graduates of Harvard and other Ivy League institutions and New Ivy League institutions.

These graduates don’t want to know.

They don’t want to know because knowing such would force them to recognize that they are part of a criminal enterprise.

Forcing them to recognize that they are part of a criminal enterprise would put them in a moral dilemma which their minds cannot countenance.

Do they speak up and risk all the perks that the Harvard Cartel has to offer?

(And there are a lot of perks. Harvard Cartel members have a first class seat on the jet.)

Or do they stay quiet and announce themselves to the world as a moral coward?

That’s a lose lose choice, which is why it’s better not to come to that moral dilemma.

Not wanting to know is a protective reflex which protects the well-being of the organism.

By not wanting to know, the Harvard graduate can preserve all the perks of the empire for himself.

He is not at risk.

Or so he or she thinks.

Unfortunately, not wanting to know, especially in the face of crime, is an immoral and criminal act.

And it must be punished.

You see it’s not collective punishment to punish the good Harvard graduate for the crimes of the evil Harvard graduate.

It’s not collective punishment because those good Harvard graduates have also committed a crime.

They did not want to know.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Dupes, Puppets, and Whores

Entertainers who perform for King Charles at his coronation probably think, like most of you, that the royal family is an amusing sideshow.

They probably think, like you, that the royal family has no real power and that they are mere figureheads.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The royal family is the tip of the iceberg. They along with British peerage – the Dukes, the Barons, the Lords, the Earls, the Knights, the Sirs – are the glue that holds Criminal Corporate Britain together.

The royal family is the eye of the hurricane.

And that hurricane known as Criminal Corporate Britain raped the world and still rapes the world.

They do so because the existence of the royal family sends an evil and wrong message to the members of its cult: we are more important than regular people, and we are entitled to rape the people of the world so that we may live a life of luxury while common schmucks live in poverty.

The British empire, under the royal muderess, Queen Victoria, killed tens of millions of people in India. The famines in India did not result solely from drought but also from British greed and mismanagement.

If that weren’t enough, the British, who claim to be so noble by abolishing slavery in 1832, needing people to do slave work for them, chose to trick illiterate people from India with a thumbprint into working their slave plantations around the globe.

And the British worked them to death.

That’s why there exist people of Indian extraction in Guyana and Fiji. They didn’t get there on a Carnival Cruise line.

The British empire forced the Chinese through two opium wars to consume opium. Criminal Americans, like Warren Delano, FDR’s grandfather, made a fortune by joining British criminals smuggle opium.

That is how mama’s boy, FDR, no traitor to his class, came into his money.

The Chinese refer to those years from 1850 to 1949 as the 100 years of shame.

The British empire also subjugated Kenya and other countries in Africa.

Let’s not also forget that Australia and Tasmania were originally penal colonies. That’s where the British sent many Irish dissidents, people like Thomas Meagher.

Under the murderous reign of Queen Victoria, Criminal Corporate Britain engineered the famine in Ireland lest anyone think that the British were only bigoted toward non-white people.

Shiploads of grains left the shores of Ireland even as the Irish starved to death.

You see, the potato blight only affected potatoes, not other crops.

When the Irish were starving, the British said that it was the hidden hand of God that was causing this. They said that the Irish had brought this upon themselves by overpopulating.

Winston Churchill, another criminal who is celebrated today, stated as much during the famine in Bengal decades later.

He stated that the Bengalis had bred like rabbits.

As you can see, despite the incessant propaganda glorifying the British crown, and tyrannizers like Churchill, there was nothing glorious to the British empire.

They subjugated our own country in the 1600s and 1700s but were overthrown by revolution.

Surely that revolution had to count for something.

Well, it didn’t mean anything to Harvard University whose graduates cozied up to the British and still cozy up to them today.

Harvard loves the Rhodes Scholarship, named after the British bigot Cecil Rhodes who subjugated the people of Africa.

Harvard brags about the number of Rhodes Scholars that it has produced.

Of course it does. The whole purpose of the Rhodes Scholarship was and still is to rope America back into the British sphere of influence, which the British have successfully accomplished.

Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.

When Harvard celebrated its 350th anniversary in 1986, Derek Bok invited the royal parasite, Prince Charles, to deliver a keynote address.

Harvard University and the immoral elites who graduate from there, the criminal cartel that runs our country, learned well from the British.

They employ many of their tactics in the United States today.

Is it any coincidence that America runs all over the world subjugating people much as the British did over 100 to 200 years ago?

It’s not a coincidence.

Indeed, Harvard University, the traitorous mole, the traitor to the revolution, acts as a British agent.

So you see, the British empire hasn’t really fallen at all. It’s merely been transported over to the United States of America.

But since Harvard University and it’s like-minded institutions control the media, they don’t tell you about any of the crimes of the British empire.

They only wow you with the pomp and pageantry of the royal family. They make them out to be inconsequential, powerless buffoons.

They are anything but that.

If they weren’t, the monarchy would have been abolished long ago.

But it hasn’t been abolished.

It hasn’t because Criminal Corporate Britain, and it’s lackey institutions in the United States, traitorous schools like Harvard University, understand full well how important that royal glue is to their criminal enterprise.

Clueless, insecure celebrities, eager for fame and prestige, are often unwitting dupes in their game.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Divide and Conquer

What should be the proper conservative response to Dylan Mulvaney, the trans activist?

I ask this because many stars who cater to conservatives have criticized companies, such as Anheuser-Busch, who support Dylan Mulvaney.

Kid Rock recently shot up a six-pack of Bud Light.

That will get people’s attention, but will it answer the question?

What should be the proper conservative response?

Well, to begin with – and it’s always best to begin in the beginning – we should ask questions, not take action. Measure twice, cut once.

What do we mean by conservative?

A conservative generally is defined as an individual who wishes to preserve an existing order or set of principles.

In contrast, a liberal is generally defined as an individual who wishes to be open to new ideas.

But which principles and which ideas are we talking about?

Are we talking about religious principles and ideas, or are we talking about constitutional principles and ideas.

If we’re talking about constitutional principles and ideas, then conservatives should embrace the idea that Dylan Mulvaney has every right to voice her opinion. As an individual Dylan Mulvaney enjoys all the rights to the Constitution that you do, as do the advertisers at Anheuser-Busch.

If we are talking about religious principles, then again conservatives should embrace the idea that Dylan Mulaney has every right to voice her opinion, as do the advertisers at Anheuser-Busch. Tolerance is the first rule of Christianity.

Other words for tolerance are charity and love.

This does not mean that conservatives must embrace trans behavior, or trans activism.

What it does mean though is that conservatives should quietly tolerate Dylan Mulvaney’s right to be trans and a trans activist.

And her right – and Anheuser-Busch’s right – to promote beer.

Consequently, conservatives should remain quiet and not engage in a fight.

This is particularly so because it is these side issues which are preventing conservatives (and liberals) from making a real change in the United States of America.

These side issues are a distraction.

Moreover the fight gives these issues life they would not otherwise enjoy.

This is what the elites want.

Elise wants conservatives and liberals to be fighting over these minor issues.

Divide and conquer is the credo of Caesar.

When people are fighting over minor issues, they fail to agree to attack the real issues. What are the real issues?

The real issues are the constant wars that our elites fight. These wars rob wealth from the middle class.

The real issues are the healthcare system that fails to provide adequate and affordable healthcare insurance for average middle-class people.

The real issues are the run-away inflation in the United States fueled by a lackey Fed, college chums of the immoral ruling elite.

The real issues are the massive immigration on our southern border caused by our elites’ corporate raping of the people of Central America.

The real issues are the massive polarization of wealth in society caused by outsourcing of jobs and corporate greed.

The real issues are the skyrocketing homelessness in our major cities.

As long as Americans are fighting over Dylan Mulvaney, they will never be able to solve real problems.

Consequently, conservatives should quietly tolerate Dylan Mulvaney while not engaging in a fight.

It is a loser’s game to do so.

Shooting a six pack of Bud Light is theater designed to amuse – not solve problems.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved