It’s Airborne!

It’s airborne!


Maybe not.

Maybe all the talk you hear from MSM and their puppet masters at Harvard is bullshit.

This is a very technical article, but if you read the introduction and the conclusion you can see what the authors are driving at. What they’re saying is that people with mild to moderate infections of COVID-19 are unlikely to be transmitting the virus in an airborne manner.

This is because droplets below 20 µm are unlikely to enter the lower respiratory tract. Droplets below 20 µm are limited by size as to the number of viral copies they can carry. You need a certain number of viral copies in order to induce an infection.

The authors do say that people with severe COVID-19 infections could possibly transmit an infection in an airborne manner. These people however are unlikely to be walking around or eating at your local restaurant.

This article validates my own personal experience in healthcare, and it most likely validates the experience of hundreds of millions of maskless people who have congregated safely in restaurants, ballparks, and jets without getting sick. It also validates the CDC’s position prior to 2020 which was that a mask was pretty much useless.

The virus isn’t transmitted it in the way that our medical leaders think that it’s transmitted.

The virus in my experience is transmitted primarily by hand to hand contact and by fomite; the implications of this are that handwashing is far more important than a mask.

This also helps explain why the mask is useless.

If COVID-19 viruses are not transmitted it in an airborne manner, but instead by fomite and hand to hand contact, how can a mask possibly work?

Now before you respond, let me leave you with this: How many of you wearing a mask have sneezed into the mask? How many of you when feeling the need to sneeze have removed your mask and sneezed into your hand?

Assuming that you sneezed into your mask, how many of you removed that mask from your face without using your hands?

I would be remiss and negligent if I did not mention that this article represents a total condemnation of the New England Journal of Corporate Fascist Third Reich Medicine, their lackeys in academia, Harvard University, MIT, their flawed politically correct junk science theories, and the silly, laughable terms, like “super-spreader events,” that they bandy about.

Do not send your bright children to Harvard.

Do not send your bright children to MIT.

They will only become more stupid as these institutions engage in reverse engineering.

There they serve up the stupid juice in copious quantities and thus transform diamonds into lumps of coal.

If by chance you have made that mistake and sent your children to Harvard or MIT, there is hope.

Sequester them away from Cambridge (and their stupid classmates and professors who are still indoctrinated) and their intelligence will return.



Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved


President Joe steps out on a slippery slope when he mandates vaccines.

Although I believe in the vaccine for COVID-19 and have received a vaccine for COVID-19, I believe that we should operate by consent.

It’s the government’s job to make the case for the vaccine.

That the government has not made that case is reflective of their inadequacy and poor leadership.

They simply aren’t up to the task.

They’re smiling, backslapping losers.

And that includes America’s Free-Throw Bricklayer, Anthony Fauci.

Perhaps if our leaders hadn’t lied about so many aspects of this pandemic, the people might have more confidence in them.

But when you go on and say that hydroxychloroquine is a dangerous drug, and when you call ivermectin a horse dewormer, people take notice.

Certainly the approximately one million physicians in United States noticed. And most likely 3.8 million registered nurses noticed also.

Just today a patient who was on hydroxychloroquine came into my office. I said to the mom, jokingly, “You know of course the government thinks this is a dangerous drug.”

She laughed.

She left because she understood that hydroxychloroquine is a valuable drug and a safe drug.

She’s in agreement with nearly every dermatologist and rheumatologist in the world.

Well, there are many, many people out there in the United States who know that hydroxychloroquine is a safe drug.

There are many people who also know that ivermectin is a safe drug. These people have communicated this to their friends. Word spreads.

These little lies by our leaders add up, and they translate into suspicion of the government. Then when the government wants to implement a solution, the people rebel.

What does the government do in response?

Do they have anyone with any common sense who knows how to sell the vaccine to the people in a way that makes sense?


Instead, the government demonizes the vaccine refusers as regressive nut jobs.

I don’t blame the people for refusing the vaccine. That is their choice.

I blame our leaders for not being candid and for creating this situation in the first place.

Of course, we all know why they created this crisis in the first place.

They wanted to make a pile of money off the vaccine.

That’s why they denounce hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

If people got the idea that these drugs worked (even 10% of the time) and were safe, then people might ask why the drug companies don’t invest in developing analogues of these medications that might work better.

You see, the COVID-19 war is just another war of choice that our elites have created for the purposes of making money.

Just like our criminal elite created the unnecessary war of Vietnam, they created the unnecessary war in Afghanistan, and then the war against COVID-19.

It’s just a different type of war.

And yes, our elites on the national level are sick enough to do it.

They’re sick.

They’re sick pups.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Recognizing 911

What’s the best way to commemorate 9/11?

What’s the best way not to commemorate 911?

The second question is the easier one to answer. You don’t commemorate 911 by wearing a badge that says “We will never forget.”

Doing so is almost tantamount to forgetting.

And we have forgotten. Better yet, we’ve never remembered – the truth that is.

You can’t remember the truth if you’ve never chosen to face it in the first place.

In its place, Americans are given easy to remember one-liners that can fit on a badge or a bumper sticker.

It’s too easy to wear a badge. It’s too easy to paste a bumper sticker on your car.

The reason why Corporate America promotes bumper stickers is so that they, Corporate America, can forget.

The truth of their own complicity is too painful for them.

They want you to forget, or never face the truth, also.

Consequently the best way of forgetting about 911 is to buy into the company line that nineteen Saudis got together, learned how to fly jets in Florida, then crashed into the World Trade Center.

It’s even easier to blame bin Laden.

Yeah, that’s it, bin Laden did it.

Such a narrative is easy to remember, easy to put in your pocket, and easy to forget.

Additionally, the narrative is not true.

The narrative doesn’t hold up under close scrutiny and rational thinking.

Shutting down your mind is exactly what our ruling elite want you to do.

That’s why they put together neat little packages like Oswald shot JFK, and nineteen Saudis brought down the World Trade Center.

Such laughable narratives prevent you from seeing the real perpetrators.

In both cases, the JFK assassination, and the World Trade Center collapse, the perpetrators are the same.

Both JFK and the World Trade Center were brought down by the fake Christians in the CIA who farmed it out to the fake Jews in Mossad so as to hide behind the shield of antisemitism.

Anyone who even remotely suggests that Mossad is involved is deemed an anti-Semite, yet oddly enough anyone who remotely suggests that CIA is involved is never deemed an anti-Christian.

How about this? There’s nothing Christian about the CIA, and there’s nothing Jewish about Mossad.

Mossad and CIA work together. They are brothers, almost twin brothers. They were born about the same time: 1947.

Both are populated by neo-Romans, pagans really, people who think they have a religion but don’t.

They worship the gods of power and money.

JFK was brought down because Corporate America (the conglomeration of elites who populate big government, big business, big associations, big media, big sports, foundations, think tanks) didn’t like JFK‘s vision of the future. They weren’t interested in America partnering with any Third World nations. They wanted to dominate and exploit Third World nations in order to a) steal their mineral and agricultural assets, and b) establish slave plantations to which American manufacturing jobs could be outsourced.

The World Trade Center was brought down because Corporate America wanted to gain a more firm foothold in the Middle East for the purposes of securing and robbing the oil and natural gas that exists there. Plus, massive war in the Middle East would enable the pigs in Corporate America to rob the American taxpayer of his and her hard earned money. This was accomplished by printing up money en extremis.

This is the reality of the world we live in.

This is the New World Order.

The people in the Middle East are only a threat to us because we are a threat to them.

As one Iranian official noted a few years ago: It’s not Iran who is in the Gulf of Mexico; it is the United States who is in the Persian Gulf.

A hallmark of a fascist state, a totalitarian state, is that its leaders keep its population stupid, uninformed, and paranoid.

Throughout the 30s and 40s, the German people thought they were the ones under attack.

Imagine that!

In our modern world, Americans believe they are the ones under attack.

The badges and bumper stickers reinforce this false narrative.

Yet this narrative not true. It is America who is the aggressor. It is America who is waging war across the globe.

911 was perpetrated by Corporate America through their thug agency the CIA (America’s SD and SS), as a pretext to fight more war.

CIA used its partner in crime, Mossad, as a shield to protect itself from complicity via the shield of antisemitism. It’s diabolically clever when you think about it.

The best way to commemorate 9/11 is to recognize this.

The citizens who died in those towers will appreciate you for recognizing who the real perpetrators are.

Knowing this, the country can reform itself.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved


Stay out of the bond market.

Quite frankly, I never understood the bond market.

I mean I do, but I don’t.

I get confused because of the inverse relationship between the yield of the bond and how much you pay for it.

I’m a straightforward guy. I don’t like thinking in terms of inverses. And I don’t want to have to “figure it out” every time I approach the subject of bonds.

It’s as if understanding the bond market ablates the neurons that are responsible for remembering how it works.

I also don’t understand what the CNBC jerk offs mean when they say that “the bond market took a hit.”

Are they saying that the price of bonds went down, or are they saying that the yield went down?

And whatever does that mean anyway?

What do I do with that information?

If you tell me that the stock market took a hit, I get it. I can go buy the stock cheap.

But the bond market?

I don’t have the time to be deciphering what the fuck they’re talking about.

So I don’t invest in it.

In addition to that how can you get an erection over a bond?

Is that possible? I can get an erection over Apple computer, or Amazon, or a stock.

But a bond?

I have to believe in something in order to invest in it.

How can I possibly believe in a city or a government when I know there’s so much corruption going on?

I can’t and I don’t.

I suspect that bonds are something that you invest in as a last resort.

You don’t really want to invest any money there; you just do it out of default.

Bonds are a consolation prize when you don’t win the hottie.

Stocks are hotties.

Bonds are dogs.

I don’t bet on dogs.

Beyond that, the bond market can be extremely deceptive.

Sometimes the bond market goes up not because anybody believes in the bonds, but because people don’t believe in the stock market.

In that event, massive amounts of money begins to compete for bonds at least until the money decides to flow back.

What does that tell you about the status of bonds?

It tells me that you’re dealing with a consolation prize.

Is that what you want to be stuck with?

On top of that misery, one has to worry about the federal reserve: what they’re going to set the interest rate at, and how much money they’re going to print.

Throw in the usual gobbledygook about short term treasuries versus long-term treasuries, plus LIBOR, and your life becomes infinitely more difficult.



Don’t even spend one moment of your time thinking about them.

Let CNBC worry about bonds.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Is Anybody Out There

Is anybody out there?

Does anyone want to stop this pandemic?

It can be stopped, but you’ll have to take a risk.

You’ll have to let go of your belief system which keeps you hog-chained to Dr. Fauci and his kind of misguided, award-seeking, greedy, publicity obsessed people.

You’ll have to admit you were wrong.

You’ll have to admit that the supreme leaders, Harvard and the Ivy League, are thoroughly corrupt.

They’ve been lying to you in order to:

A. Promote Zoom.

B. Promote the vaccine which makes them wealthier.

C. Steal profits from small business.

D. Wreck the economy so as to institute UBI – Universal Basic Income.

E. Maximize the welfare state.

F. Pacify the people into total compliance.

G. Engage in euthanasia of the elderly.

H. Completely subvert and rewrite the Constitution.

They’ve been selling junk science through the main stream media that they control.

It’s been a fucking nightmare, made worse by their interventions.

If you have power, do the following:

A. Encourage all young people to aggressively congregate as much as possible in activities and sports. The virus must be shared.

B. Send kids back to school.

C. Get rid of face masks. The face mask causes fear which causes people to not commingle.

D. Get rid of fear. The virus very rarely kills healthy young people; when it does kill young people, generally those young people have underlying health problems.

E. Turn off your news apps. Why get your mind polluted by lies from Buzzfeed.

F. Protect the elderly and vulnerable.

G. Get the vaccine unless contraindicated. Sure, Dr. Fauci is evil (evil defined as placing the economic interests of the elites above the health and welfare of the people), and he’s an award-hog, but don’t let that get in the way of you getting the vaccine. I got it, and I d-e-s-p-i-s-e Dr. Fauci.

H. STOP social distancing.

I. Wash your hands. Handwashing is the most important thing you can do. You must do it before you eat. You can’t touch anything while you eat. If you do, you have to re-wash your hands as many times as it takes.

J. Don’t accept any food that someone hands to you with their bare hands.

K. Quarantine the sick.

L. Test the newly arrived.

M. Don’t bring in outside doctors or nurses. The CIA will happily import healthcare people who will give half-assed care to your people. They want deaths. Deaths heighten fear; and no, CIA people are not Americans just like you.

N. Have your local doctors actively involved in reviewing all cases of COVID-19 and the treatment involved.

O. Mandate ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine as adjunctive therapies unless they’re medically, not politically, contraindicated.

P. Leave patients on the vent for as long as it takes. Even if it takes 60 days or 75 days, leave them on the vent. If the brain is functioning, the lungs will slowly heal. In time the patient can get off the vent. They may need oxygen. Half the lungs may be destroyed. So what? We have people walking around right now with COPD waiting for lung transplants, so what’s the big deal?

Q. People of Italian, French, Hispanic, and Portuguese descent are more affected. So are blacks. There is a genetic basis to this disease. Don’t buy into the multicultural “it affects us all” bullshit being foisted upon the public. Yes it does affect us all, but some more than others.

If your community can do this consistently for two to three months, the virus can be beaten.

It would help if all communities did it, because it is the indolence and smoldering of the infection that is keeping it going.

Think of a fire in your house. What’s your goal? Be aggressive; don’t have fear; put it all out. What’s not your goal? Half-assed measures.

You can do this for every mutation of this virus. This is what we did for influenza.

So why didn’t we do this for COVID-19? For the reasons I explained above.

People like Bill Gates and his baby boomer kind are getting older. They are staring at the end of the line, and they want to get this mouse utopia done – now. So they are moving into hyperdrive.

And they’ve got the entire main stream media behind them. Why not? They own them, and that includes these phony avant-garde, pseudo-cutting-edge publications like the Daily Beast.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Bangladesh Face Mask Study

OK, let’s talk about the Bangladesh study on face-masks.

This is a study the empire conducted in order to prove that face-masks work.

Here is the author’s opening statement:

“Background: Mask usage remains low across many parts of the world during the COVID- 19 pandemic, and strategies to increase mask-wearing remain untested. Our objectives were to identify strategies that can persistently increase mask-wearing and assess the impact of increasing mask-wearing on symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.”

From the get-go the implementers indict themselves. Why would you seek to increase mask use unless you had already bought into the concept that they work?

In a nutshell the empire went out to many villages in Bangladesh and did a prospective study, which is good, in which they gave approximately 178,288 villagers face-masks in order to measure the effectiveness of the face-mask. They then compared COVID-19 infections in those 163,838 villagers against villagers who were not encouraged to wear face-masks at all.

The villagers who were given face-masks were asked to comply in wearing face-masks.

Face-mask use was monitored in mosques and other areas of public domain.

Presumably these two groups of villagers were citizens of different villages.

COVID-19 infection was monitored by symptomatology and by seroprevalence meaning that they drew the villagers blood to check for antibodies.

The study, according to the implementers, proves that face-masks work. They point to increased symptomatology of COVID-19 and increased seroprevalence in the villagers who did not wear face-masks.

The implementers and the empire they represent are currently running around the village square high-fiving each other.

You see, they crow, we were right.

Not so fast.

Let’s begin at the beginning. Who funded this study? That can always tell us a lot. Well, it’s just so happens that the implementers told us. It was funded by, a foundation you can examine on the Internet.

GiveWell’s website tells you a lot.

GiveWell’s leadership is populated plentifully with graduates from the empire’s top schools. There are plenty of Yale, MIT, Stanford, UC Berkeley types there.

Do you really think they and the implementers of this study are going to defy the power establishment and risk their first class ticket in America?

They’re not stupid. They can see what happened to Cornel West. They can see what happened to the Dixie Chicks.

Can you imagine if they came back with a study that said the face-mask was worthless?

Career over.

That aside, let’s look at the major problems with the study.

First, it was not double blinded. Not only was it not double blinded, it wasn’t blinded. That of course comes about for obvious reasons. It’s pretty tough for a subject of a study to not know whether he’s wearing a face-mask or not. Likewise for the implementers.

For the implementers to be blinded, you’d have to shuttle the patients to a neutral town for observation and testing, or they’d have to submit answers over the phone – unlikely in Bangladesh.

That it is difficult to blind the study in no way legitimizes the results. In fact its lack of blinded-ness is a real problem.

Everyone, including the implementers, has a built in bias that effects how one will construct the study. The biased mind subconsciously shades conditions to favor its own preconceived beliefs. The biased mind really doesn’t desire the truth as truth may be painful.

Were the masked villagers placed into a state of fear by the implementers through constant monitoring. Apparently they were as the implementers reveal that social distancing increased in the masked group of villagers. And was it that fear-engendered social distancing in masked villagers that caused the decrease in COVID-19 infections?

Were the masked villagers from higher socioeconomic groups where education and sanitation is higher and better?

Did the villages have different customs that might have contributed to the differences in COVID-19 prevalence? For example, some villages may have had a greater tradition of handwashing.

Bangladesh is probably a more tribal community than that seen in the United States. The United States is fairly homogeneous; not so countries in the third world.

There may be stark genetic differences from one village to the next. We know that India has many dialects. What about Bangladesh? If there are different dialects, the customs and genetics may be very different as well. And this will affect results.

That aside, let’s look at the data. The results hardly represent a ringing endorsement for the mask. But before we examine those, let me note that the methodology used in this study is a laughable case of paralysis through analysis. If I as a trained physician am overwhelmed at the amazing complexity of the methodology of mask use and mask monitoring employed, how much more confused were the villagers? Maybe they didn’t get COVID-19 because their brains were frozen into a state of paralysis by the mask guidelines.

One shouldn’t require an IQ of 900 and an advanced degree in the calculus of imaginary numbers to conduct and interpret a study, unless, of course, you don’t want it interpreted properly.

Here is what the implementers wrote: The proportion of individuals with COVID-like symptoms was 7.62% (N=13,273) in the intervention (masks) arm and 8.62% (N=13,893) in the control (maskless) arm. Blood samples were collected from N=10,952 consenting, symptomatic individuals. Adjusting for baseline covariates, the intervention reduced symptomatic seroprevalence by 9.3%.

To recap, there were approximately 340,000 total participants, 170,000 in each group, masked and unmasked.

7.62 % of the masked had COVID-19 symptomatology; 8.62% of the maskless had COVID-19 symptomatology. Then they measured IgG levels in the two groups, but of the roughly 27,000 with symptoms, only 10,952 consented to have their blood drawn. Of those tested there was a disparity in prevalence of COVID-19 antibodies of 9.3%.

With regard to symptomatology, there were only 620 more infections in the maskless group. 13,973 versus 13,273. But that’s just symptomatology. If the study is not blinded, who’s to say that the implementers didn’t go out of their way to find more evidence of infection in the maskless group?

I would have more confidence in this study if the people who were collecting the data had no idea whether the people were wearing masks or were not wearing masks.

As I say, this may not have been possible if whole villages were selected. How could a collector of information not know if the subject had been wearing a mask or not?

With regard to seroprevalence which seems to be more objective, the implementers claim 9.3% disparity between the masked group and the maskless group. It seems reasonable to accept this number.

The problem with these seroprevalence results however is that not everyone consented to give blood. Again, the lack of blinded-ness will affect the results. If I know a person is sick and wearing a mask, I may choose to discourage or reject a blood test from that villager.

There are other problems with this study. It is physically impossible to monitor this many people with high efficiency and reliability.

Additionally one would also have to take into account household population densities.

Then there is the problem of not drawing blood amongst all patients suspected of having COVID-19. With the blinders off, an implementer might easily draw blood off the sickest of the maskless while ignoring the sickest of the masked.

But if it were the case that the people who got their blood tested weren’t chosen except through their own volition, then it might be reasonable to ask if there were any factors which might induce the sickest of the masked to be less likely to get their blood drawn.

Well, maybe they did want their blood tested but were delayed and prevented from having it drawn by the implementers who were being paid by GiveWell and were smart enough to see what the study was really about.

What these questions in part illustrate is that when it comes to studies in general, a study is not necessarily better because it has more people.

Nor can you change reality with fancy stats and Cox regression analysis.

But this is what the empire desired.

The empire loves open and shut cases.

The empire l-o-v-e-s blue ribbon panels and fancy school graduates. They know you will get suckered by men in white coats who hail from towering Meccas of shimmering glass and steel – especially if the implementers and authors are resume hounds who have attended phony Ivy League schools.

The empire also knows that you won’t take the time to read their study.

So to achieve their ends, they rounded up some loyalists (puppets and true believers) and went to Bangladesh, a country far removed from American scrutiny, where it might be possible to induce an impoverished people who, for a few bucks, might give the elites the results their empire so desperately requires.

Would our elites do that?

Why, yes they would.

The elites are real good at corralling wannabes who wanna sit with the cool kids in the cafeteria.

Fuck the cool kids.

These wannabes, these academic puppets, are clueless followers who desperately seek to be invited to a State Dinner or a ride on Air Force One.

Throw in a little federal grant money, and Buster, you’ve got yourself a professor.

When our wannabes aren’t groveling before the political class, they’re queuing up at the Louvre for their chance to Sieg Heil before the Mona Lisa.

They don’t know why they believe Leo is the greatest painter who ever lived; they just believe it because it’s another item to store in their buzzword repository.

For all we know Leo was one of the worst artists in Florence. After all how many redos did it take him to get the Mona Lisa right?

Beyond that, why should we care what some cocksucker at the Smithsonian thinks?

We shouldn’t, and neither should the academics.

What we need out of academia are voracious tigers who rip the flesh off their prey.

When it comes to research, we don’t want nice people, smiling backslapping goofballs.

We need courage, courage to act, courage to think, courage to attack like a motherfucker.

Now, you may ask why I am taking an aggressive stance against this study. Because it goes against my work experience and most likely the work experience of every single honest pediatrician and honest family practitioner in all countries across the globe. It also goes against your life experience, that of you, the reader, who have eaten at innumerable restaurants, flown on innumerable airline flights, and congregated at innumerable parties sans mask without getting sick.

Where is the beef?

If mankind could get infected by respiratory droplets this easily, man never would have made it out of his first cave. Your body isn’t that dumb. Only professors can be this stupid.

For 37 years I worked in front of coughing children, day in day out, up close and personal and hardly ever get sick.


A face-mask? Forget it.

I washed my hands.

Nobody wore a face mask.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Purpose of the Mask

Why, given the choice, I choose to not wear a face mask.

There is no good evidence that it works to prevent infection – despite the many flawed studies that purport that it does.

Even if it did prevent infection, the mask would still be a bad idea because what we need is for people, particularly young people, to spread this virus as fast as they possibly can. Such an approach will close the virus (and its variants) down until, of course, the elites create a new one. As it is now, our current approach is producing a smoldering abscess of chronic infection.

The mask plays into fear, and fear is a far worse toxin than the virus will ever be.

The elites want this mask for a reason. I know these people. I know how they think and how they plan. In the 1980s the elites pushed through cargo pants and look-alike military clothing for kids. They followed it up with violent music, Mortal Kombat, and Gameboys which taught little kids how to kill people and not feel bad about it. George Carlin called them our Nintendo pilots.

These trends in dress in music are not begun organically in some small town; they are instituted by the state here and abroad. Every country attempts to control dress, music, entertainment and literature.

Mao had his Mao Suit and Little Red Book of Quotations; Kim Jong-un has his approved haircuts for the people.

The elites are evil, but they aren’t stupid; like the Nazis, they prepare in advance. In the 80s and 90s they were preparing little kids to be the future fighters in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This mask, promoted by the elites, is there for a reason, and it has nothing to do with saving lives. What precisely is it for? I don’t know; I’m not the one committing the crime. But whatever it is, it’s not good for us.

It could be for the purposes of engineering a more obedient, compliant nation that is less likely to rebel. Whatever it is, they have studied it.

Our government has invested enormous amounts of money into the CIA which conducts and has conducted untold number of programs to study the psychology of the mind and how it can be manipulated and altered. That’s what MK Ultra was all about.

One of our elites’ goals might be to develop a soldier who has no qualms about committing mass genocide. To accomplish this young minds must be de-socialized. The mask might enable this de-socialization in young developing minds.

How can we suspect that this might be the reason our elites are pushing the mask?

The German Einsatzgruppen in WWII was a particularly notorious group of killers. One of the problems that Himmler faced with them and various guards in the concentration camps was the emotional toll that killing Jews, Poles, Gypsies and Russians wreaked upon the soldiers who were asked to do the killing.

German soldiers were requiring much R&R to heal their minds from the killing. Many flat out refused to kill.

This problem of Himmler’s still persists principally because the Third Reich never died. The Third Reich was moved over to the United States. Our elites on Wall Street financed Hitler. Our elites adored Hitler. Our elites took all of Hitler’s ideas and installed them here in the United States.

One of those ideas is an Einsatzgruppen that can go into a foreign nation and commit mass genocide.

Does that sound crazy?

To us average citizens it does, but our elites aren’t average citizens; they are sick pups consumed with money and power. Killing for them is a means to make more money.

Killing for them is an economic program.

Note: The only reason WWII was fought was to replace German Imperalism with American Imperialism. Our elites didn’t give a damn about the Jews. FDR sat on his ass for nine years and did nothing. And he knew everything that was going on with the Jews. He was the fucking President of the United States. His buddies at Sullivan and Cromwell had offices in Nazi Germany. American IG Farben was a sister company to IG Farben. GE was a sister company to AEG (Germany’s General Electric.). Standard Oil had business relationships with the Nazis.

Wars are not begun by our elites for social justice; they are fought for money and power. The social justice angle is the BS they peddle to us to rope us in to their criminal enterprise.

Fuck you, elites.

Fuck you, Harvard.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Prince of Privilege

What will happen with Prince Andrew?

Will he be dragged to America to answer questions with regard to Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein?

Don’t bet on it.

The Queen and the royal family are not just figureheads in Britain. They are the top of British nobility, and it is British nobility that is the glue that holds criminal Corporate Britain together.

Britain raped the world and killed tens of millions of people with great efficiency over the past 500 years.

They starved millions of people in India and Ireland as they were exporting life-saving crops from those countries.

They ran slave plantations around the globe populated by illiterate Hindus who were tricked into indentured servitude with a thumbprint.

The British worked their slaves to death.

As they were raping India, the British were simultaneously raping China for 100 years.

They forced the Chinese people to consume opium.

Britain was able to do this because its criminal corporations worked together.

A house divided will fall.

Teams that work together win championships.

Divided teams lose.

Think of the royal family as a rallying point rather than people who make decisions.

The Queen, Prince Charles, and the rest of the parasitic scum don’t make any decisions with regard to how Britain runs.

They don’t have to.

They only need to exist.

Their function is to hold the the criminal corporate enterprise together.

They are the mother of all glues.

As such, any convictions of the royal family will seriously damage the adhesive that holds the criminal enterprise in focus.

To prevent that, Britain and the royal family will move heaven and earth to make sure that nothing happens to any one member of the royal family.

Consequently, you can expect nothing substantial to come of this investigation into Prince Andrew.

If they have to, the elites will conjure up a medically suspicious mental illness, lock him away on a remote estate under heavy guard, never to be seen again.

The elites cannot ask for anything less, for if a member of the royal family is convicted, then the machine begins to unravel.

Additionally, if regular folk in Britain, who have been beaten down for centuries into bowing before their betters, begin to see that the elites can be held accountable for their crimes, then they will begin to ask for more of the same.

Currently in Britain, like America, the rich never truly pay for their crimes.

The rich and privileged paying for their crimes?

That’s not a precedent the wealthy elite in Britain are willing to set.

Beyond that though, there’s an even greater reason and a greater motivation for the elites to not convict Prince Andrew.

If the royal family becomes unraveled, if Britain becomes unraveled, that unraveling also sucks power away from the elites in our country because the elites in our country, particularly the unenlightened at Harvard University, adore the royal family.

Britain and its nobility is their role model.

That’s their reason for being.

Indeed, our leaders at Harvard University are thirsting for the day when they can acquire titles of British nobility.

All that stuff you see in Pride and Prejudice with Mr. Darcy and his mansion – the Harvard elites eat that shit up. That’s what they want.

Therefore, the Harvard elite, who control this country, who have hijacked this country, will work together with British nobility to make sure that nothing substantial happens to Prince Andrew.

He’s the Prince of Privilege.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Price of Fame

Why is Cardi B famous?

I know that she’s a talented gal, but why is she famous?

She’s famous because the elites said that she would be famous.


That’s the way the elites are. If they don’t want you to be famous, you aren’t going to be famous.

Our elites are sick, but that’s the way it is.

And there’s a reason why it is the way it is.

Our elites cannot afford to have famous people who they do not control.

Famous people have influence. That’s why the elites control famous people.

The very last thing that the elites want is a famous person who they do not control who will sway the masses against them.

Our athletes are evil, but they aren’t stupid.

That’s why the vast majority of the famous people you see you today are puppets of the elites.

They don’t want their record deal canceled.

They don’t want their concerts canceled.

They are still young and desirous of making money.

In addition to that, they’ve got a good thing going.

They’re making tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars.

They’re no sucker.

They’re not going to give up that cash cow.

The only people who the elites can’t fully control are the older celebrities who aren’t interested in making any more money.

They have already made her money.

But trust me, if even one of these older celebrities becomes too popular and gets in the way of what the elites want, the elites will go out of their way to destroy that individual.

That’s one of the reasons they went after Bill Cosby.

Bill Cosby was telling black youth to dress right, speak right, and to integrate in society.

Bill Cosby understood that rage and gangster culture wasn’t going to cut the mustard. He wanted to see black folk compete in the white man’s world.

He understood that black folk could compete and win because he lived it.

It’s pretty much the same message that Booker T. Washington gave over 100 years ago.

The elites don’t want that though.

The elites don’t want black folk to integrate at all, at least not the black folk who live in the inner city.

The elites need the black folk to serve as prisoners for their Corporate Prison racket.

The gangster culture, drug culture, rap music, hip-hop music is an important component in ensuring that black folk,and increasingly white folk, are focused on lifestyles that aren’t going to present a threat to the ruling elite.

Who is making a fortune off the gangster culture?

The ruling elite.

They own the celebrities. They own the radio stations. They own the record companies. They own it all.

Who made Cardi B and her vile music mainstream?

The ruling elite.

Who made Cardi B fabulously wealthy?

The ruling elite.

Who promoted gangster culture in the movies?

The ruling elite.

Who promoted drug culture in the movies?

The ruling elite.

Who loses in all of this?

Primarily poor folk in the inner city who have already had their communities devastated by drugs.

What poor folks, black and white, need desperately are education and positive role models within the community.

The celebrities could make a tremendous difference to the people who live in devastated communities.

Why don’t you see celebrities with all their hundreds of millions of dollars setting up their own apparel factories to employ poor black folk in the inner city?

Why should LeBron James with all his fame shill for Nike shoes when he can set up a shoe factory in the inner city and do kick ass business?

If he did, he would be fulfilling the dream of Marcus Garvey who wanted to set up corporations owned by blacks, run by blacks to do for blacks what white people wouldn’t do.

So what’s the hold up here?

The holdup is that the elites don’t want that. They don’t want free enterprise in the black community.

Free enterprise in the black community would threaten their welfare plantation racket. Plus, if black folks had money, their families would prosper. Prosperous families are less likely to commit crimes because they don’t need to commit the crimes. Prosperous families who don’t commit crimes are a threat to the Corporate Prison racket that the elites are running.

If LeBron James made a serious effort at opening up his own shoe and apparel company in the inner city, the elites would squash him like a bug.

The same goes for Cardi B. The elites made her, and they can break her.

If she opened up in apparel company that was transforming unemployed welfare recipients into wage earning, prosperous citizens who were less likely to commit crimes, the elites would squash her like a bug.

That’s the way it is.

But that’s not the way it has to be.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Big Slide

How did the big slide in America occur?

It occurred before our eyes without us even knowing it.

And we did it to ourselves. It wasn’t done without our help.

It began of course with the generation preceding World War II. This would be the generation of my grandfather, the World War I generation.

They truly lived in the America that was, the America that is currently referred to as racist and bigoted.

They would have no ability to survive in our world today. They would not understand it at all.

It was about this time – in the early 1920s – that our elites got together and began the grand transformation of America into a neo-feudalist state modeled on the feudalist state of old.

Our elites of course never liked the American experiment.

The American experiment gave regular people a window.

It wasn’t just a window for people to excel and live a good life; it was a window of revelation demonstrating to regular people that they were just as good as the elites.

The elites viewed this revelation as dangerous.

What really galled the elites was that the American experiment was working. Not only was America prospering, it was prospering above and beyond the old system of Europe.

This is why America became a beacon to the world. This is why people came to America.

To combat this, European nobility, particularly British nobility, began their attempt to rope America back into the feudalist mindset of thinking.

It was always the dream of Cecil Rhodes to get America back into the fold.

He was enabled in his quest by his newly enriched friends, the social climbing robber barons, and of course, his friends at Harvard University.

Harvard University has never been a friend of the American experiment.

From day one, Harvard has worked against average Americans and the idea that regular people are just as important as so-called elite people.

Harvard was more than willing to help Cecil Rhodes corral Americans back into the royalist fold.

Harvard embraced the Rhodes scholarship. Harvard embraces the Rhodes Scholarship today. When Harvard had its 350th anniversary, who did Derek Bok, the then president of Harvard, invite as a vital speaker to his ceremony? None other than Prince Charles.

Harvard is an elitist institution.

Its grandiose graduation ceremony where the wealthy elite congratulate themselves in opulence while homelessness (that Harvard engendered) abounds is a national embarrassment.

Harvard leads the Ivy League. It is the oldest school in the nation. It is older than our Constitution.

The Ivy League exists to train the officers of Corporate America.

Corporate America runs America and Harvard controls Corporate America.

Corporate America is comprised of not just corporations, but foundations, associations, thank tanks, major media, sports leagues, major entertainment, and of course the government.

It is that Corporate America fueled by Harvard University and the Ivy League that has engineered the demise of America.

As I said, they did it before our eyes. And with our help.

They did it through a series of crises that they created.

They created WWI, they created the Great Depression, they created World War II.

They have created every debacle since then.

These crises gave them the opportunity to further increase the power of the federal government, to take control of America’s businesses, to foment nonstop war abroad, to exploit other peoples, to dumb down the population, to weaken the population through drugs, gambling, cheap gossip and crummy celebrity culture.

They did it slowly and they did it in a very insidious manner.

Who would object? After all the leaders were solving a crisis.

To keep any skeptics at bay, their attempts at solving these crises were always wrapped within a cocoon of lies.

Subtle conments like Franklin Roosevelt being a traitor to his class was a pervasive lie intended to convince Americans that the government was on their side.

Of course, Franklin Roosevelt was not a traitor to his class at all. Franklin Roosevelt expanded the government through the Great Depression and World War II and in so doing transformed a small racket, the government, into a humongous racket from which his friends profited enormously.

His successors, particularly Dwight Eisenhower, fought a Cold War, created by the elites, engineered by the elites, to give us the current military industrial complex. That Dwight Eisenhower would warn us about the military industrial complex is a joke. Dwight Eisenhower was the military industrial complex.

How did our elites prosecute the Cold War?

First by creating a bogus bogeymen of communist domination, a force that had to be defeated.

Second, capitalist imperialism through exploitation and domination of other peoples. These efforts principally engineered by Allen Dulles with the full backing of Dwight Eisenhower, were anti-Christian and antithetical to the principles of the Founding Fathers.

The big lie was that Dwight Eisenhower was our friend. The big lie was Dwight Eisenhower himself.

Here was Dwight Eisenhower, a war hero, who won a war, World War II, that our elites were responsible for in the first place, who was now continuing that war against the evil Soviet Union.

The sad truth is that it was the United States that was the aggressive nation around the world.

It is so today.

All our major problems that we face today, the immigration from Central America, the enmity with Iran, the enmity with Venezuela can be laid at the feet of Dwight Eisenhower, our friend.

Ike overthrew Mosaddegh in Iran in 1953. His crime? He nationalized the British oil fields to give his people opportunities.

Ike overthrew Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954. His crime? He wanted to take a small amount of uncultivated land and give it to the peasants.

Ike played tricks and games with the Indonesians in the 1950s because Sukarno wanted to take a third way between capitalism and communism. Ike set the table. Finally in the mid 60s Sukarno was overthrown so that the United States could steal the assets of Indonesia for greedy pigs like Forbes Wilson of Freeport Sulphur. Our CIA helped Suharto, Sukarno’s replacement and our thug, kill 1 million of his opponents. CIA officers who helped Suharto are not ashamed of their actions.

The goal of our leaders has never been to help the people of the world or the people of the United States; it’s always been about exploitation for the purposes of profit making.

We didn’t go into Vietnam in order to help the people of Southeast Asia. We went into Vietnam in order to establish a presence, a beach head, in order to control the vital resources that the region possessed.

Of course, we already had the Philippines as a base from which to stage our operations, but Vietnam would give us a beach head on the mainland.

There were enormous assets in minerals, oil, and agriculture to be controlled. Latex, rubber, oil, gold and copper. The largest copper and gold mines were known to be in New Guinea.

It was vital that the United States control the region. This is how it was sold to my parents and grandparents. The thinking was that what was good for Corporate America was good for the citizens of the United States. That was another lie.

If we could save Vietnam, we could prevent the whole region from going communist. It was called the Domino Theory.

The problem with that theory is that it wasn’t necessarily so. The people there weren’t so much communist as they were nationalist. They wanted to control their own destiny. They wanted a piece of the pie. They didn’t want to be exploited.

Had we given them a stake in the game, we would have avoided the problems that we face today.

Of course, that was never the game plan of Allen Dulles and Dwight Eisenhower. Their goal was exploitation and domination. Why would we think otherwise? Dwight Eisenhower was Douglas MacArthur’s right hand man in the Philippines. It was plain enough for him to see that United States was never going to give Filipinos a stake in the game.

And so our elites moved in. They used every evil and malignant trick in the book to get their way. One of their favorite stratagems was to buy a dictator with money, have him spread the money to his cronies who would then control the population.

The United States owned legions of them around the globe. Machado, Batista, Trujillo, Baby Doc, Somoza, the Shah, Marcos, the list goes on and on.

This worked for a while until the people realized that they were being exploited.

Some rebelled, others never bought in from the get go.

One rebellion resulted in the Vietnam war.

Ike set the table there too.

The Vietnam war was tremendously damaging to the psyche of the United States and its people.

It produced a cynicism and distrust of our leaders which was well deserved.

It was more clear to the people that our leaders did not have their best interest at heart.

Concomitantly Americans began turning toward drugs. Baby boomers were young and willing to experiment. Disillusioned veterans were also willing to experiment. This was aided and abetted by our Central Intelligence Agency which helped import drugs into the United States. Yes, that’s right, our CIA made a deal with the drug lords in Southeast Asia to import drugs into the United States in exchange for them helping us in Vietnam.

Unfortunately, for the American people the weaker you are, the less able you are to fight back.

It didn’t take too long before the United States corporations began outsourcing jobs to these newly exploited nations.

What a winner for the elites. They now owned many servile countries around the globe to which they could export US labor.

They could not only break the backs of labor unions and the people of the United States of America, they could make a windfall of profits by paying people in Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, not to mention Central America peanuts for jobs that used to provide living wages for United States citizens.

As a result, many people in the United States lost their well paying jobs. This occurred across all sectors of industry in the United States.

A line worker at GM in 1970 could make about $75,000 per year in today’s money without a college education. A current Starbucks barista can make $30,000 a year if they’re lucky.

This produced a general lowering of standards for the American family. When the family is weakened financially, the family is weakened spiritually. This then produces social ills such as crime, drug use, drug abuse, spousal abuse, child abuse, psychological turmoil and a lower level of education

These changes occurred slowly before our eyes.

To combat this, our government did not stop outsourcing of jobs, nor did it make any serious attempt to curtail the drug trade. Those were money makers for the elites.

Our government gave us Band-Aids. They gave us gambling. They gave us cheap gossip. They gave us celebrity culture.

If a patient is in pain, a good doctor tries to find the root cause and fix that. A good doctor doesn’t give morphine and walk away.

Our government gave us morphine.

In addition to these worthless Band-Aids, the government permitted corporations to continue their ravaging of the American workplace.

Chief executive officers and their henchmen were permitted to control the board room so as to enrich themselves wildly beyond anyone’s dream as far as compensation packages were concerned. Not only did they give themselves exorbitant salaries and golden parachutes, they also awarded themselves millions of shares of stock. In essence, they raped the shareholder.

This continues to this day.

The focus then became to get rich,and most of the baby boomers being young got suckered into this movement.

The elites took advantage of our greed and desire to be rich in order to fuck the American republic.

We did it to ourselves.

We were blind.

This is why Oliver Stone made the movie Wall Street. He wanted to demonstrate the sickness in American society, what was wrong with American society.

We all watched Wall Street and thought it was a great movie, but it was a movie. We were busy making money and dreaming of getting rich, so we continued along our merry way.

As we moved through the 1980s and into the 90s we were seduced by Ronald Reagan, his successors and the concept of free trade. We became even more anti-communist. We fully bought into the evil empire that was Russia.

We didn’t see outsourcing of jobs as a bad thing. It was all sold under the lie of free trade. Free trade was looked at as anti-communist and anti-elitist, not for what it was, free imperialism.

Plus – the media controlled by the elites had thoroughly demonized the labor unions as corrupt.

We didn’t see the good in the Teamsters, only the bad.

We wanted the Teamsters gone.

Free Trade was embraced.

We didn’t see the damage that free trade was doing to the United States.

It was only when political correctness came into being under Bill Clinton‘s administration that we first began to get an idea that we had been had.

One could start to see where the elites were heading with all this.

Never to be out done the elites cleverly distracted us with the World Trade Center bombing. Once again we got roped into believing that yet another enemy of America was attacking us.

We responded by going whole hog into the Middle East. We never asked any questions. It was clear that these Muslims were attacking us because they didn’t like our way of life. We never asked what they would know about our way of life. We just bought the lie.

Many Americans buy into this lie today.

Am I losing you?

We now live in an Orwellian world. The elites lie with impunity. They rig elections openly.

The apotheosis of their lying nature finds itself in the coronavirus pandemic. From the beginning the elites have lied to us every step of the way.

Legitimate criticisms are censored. Flat out lies are told.

The COVID-19 crisis is being used to reengineer society, but not for the betterment of man, but for the economic benefits of the rich.

Our elites, our crony capitalists, hide behind Karl Marx and use him as a shield.

They have no desire for a grassroots socialism.

Oh, no, what they are after is a much bigger game – fascism.

Welcome to the New World Order.

We did it to ourselves.


Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved