Jack and Lee 5

I worked harder on killing Lee than I did on the JFK and Tippit killing combined.

Not really, but it seemed like I did.

I guess it seemed more difficult because I had to connive it at the last moment.

Connive it, ha ha.

I love the way Dean talks.

That would be Dean Andrews.

He was right of course.  Lee couldn’t have connived the killing of Kennedy.

You do have to practice at things.

And not just for shooting at someone.

You have to practice planning things.

And that’s what I do; that’s my unofficial job at the CIA.

I’m a conniver, ha ha.

That’s why I was able to connive Lee’s murder on the fly.

You see, Lee was supposed to die at the Texas Theater.

But he outsmarted me.

I expected him to run and get gunned down by the cops, but he was smarter than I gave him credit for.

That was my mistake.

He raised his hands and said: “I am not resisting arrest,” or something to that effect.

That’s when Nick McDonald clocked him over his left eye.  That’s how Lee got the mouse.

I guess Nick interpreted Lee raising his hands as an aggressive move.

At any rate, when they both fell down into the chair and the melee ensued, it was difficult to justify killing him.

So he lived, and that presented a problem for me.

I had to shift gears damn quick and work double time to fix what shouldn’t be broken.

Now, how was I going to kill him?

 


 

Dean Andrews Testimony before the Warren Commission

 

Mr. LIEBELER – Do you mean to suggest by that statement that you have considerable doubt in your mind that Oswald killed the President? 

Mr. ANDREWS – I know good and well he did not. With that weapon, he couldn’t have been capable of making three controlled shots in that short time. 

Mr. LIEBELER – You are basing your opinion on reports that you have received over news media as to how many shots were fired in what period of time; is that correct? 

Mr. ANDREWS – I am basing my opinion on five years as an ordnance man in the Navy. You can lean into those things, and with throwing the bolts–if I couldn’t do it myself, 8 hours a day, doing this for a living, constantly on the range, I know this civilian couldn’t do it. He might have been a sharp marksman at one time, but if you don’t lean into that rifle and don’t squeeze and control consistently, your brain can tell you how to do it, but you don’t have the capability. 

Mr. LIEBELER – You have used a pronoun in this last series of statements, the pronoun “it.” You are making certain assumptions as to what actually happened, or you have a certain notion in your mind as to what happened based on material you read in the newspaper? 

Mr. ANDREWS – It doesn’t make any difference. What you have to do is lean into a weapon, and, to fire three shots controlled with accuracy, this boy couldn’t do it. Forget the President. 

Mr. LIEBELER – You base that judgment on the fact that, in your own experience, it is difficult to do that sort of thing? 

Mr. ANDREWS – You have to stay with it. You just don’t pick up a rifle or a pistol or whatever weapon you are using and stay proficient with it. You have to know what you are doing. You have to be a conniver. This boy could have connived the deal, but I think he is a patsy. Somebody else pulled the trigger. 

Mr. LIEBELER – However, as we have indicated, it is your opinion. You don’t have any evidence other than what you have already told us about your surmise and opinions about the rifle on which to base that statement; is that correct? If you do, I want to know what it is. 

Mr. ANDREWS – If I did, I would give it to you. It’s just taking the 5 years and thinking about it a bit. I have fired as much as 40,000 rounds of ammo a day for 7 days a week. You get pretty good with it as long as you keep firing. Then I have gone back after 2 weeks. I used to be able to take a shotgun, go on a skeet, and pop 100 out of 100. After 2 weeks, I could only pop 60 of them. I would have to start shooting again, same way with the rifle and machine guns. Every other person I knew, same thing happened to them. You just have to stay at it. 

 

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Copyright 2019   Archer Crosley   All Rights Reserved

This is a work of fiction based upon real events.

 

Support Donation

To support the time and effort in producing this blog, please make a small one-time donation. I will totally appreciate your contribution, but I only want you to make a donation if you think this is the very best stuff out there. Otherwise, fuhgeddaboutit.

$5.00

Five Things

Support Donation

To support the time and effort in producing this blog, please make a small one-time donation. I will totally appreciate your contribution, but I only want you to make a donation if you think this is the very best stuff out there. Otherwise, fuhgeddaboutit.

$5.00

 

If I had to come up with five things we could do to take down the New World Order, I would recommend the following.  Of course, I could hardly do better than the doctrine of Jesus Christ which was responsible for taking down the Roman Empire  – the original New World Order.

 

  1. Reaffirm individualism.  Walk away from collectivism as a panacea to solving the problems in your life.  Do not blame others or other groups for your problems.  Accept personal responsibility.
  2. Accept tolerance and forgiveness as a way of life.  Be charitable to other’s reasonable failings and try to give people a second chance. Refuse to follow the media’s call for someone to be fired for every faux pas that they find objectionable.
  3. Reject the maniacal love of money as a solution to your personal problems.
  4. Ask the clergy to stay in their lane.  Implore them to not enter the house of the politico but to ask the politico to enter the house of God.  Beg the clergy to stick to what they were trained to do:  To mend the wounded soul.
  5. Reject elitism and its ideology.  Reject the notion of the best and brightest.  Accept that great power rests within all peoples.   Reject the false ornaments, titles, awards, crowns and medals that elitism confers to connote superiority.

 

Support Donation

Did you like the column? How about a buck? Thanks much.

$1.00

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Copyright 2019   Archer Crosley   All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

Secondary Issues

Support Donation

To support the time and effort in producing this blog, please make a small one-time donation. I will totally appreciate your contribution, but I only want you to make a donation if you think this is the very best stuff out there. Otherwise, fuhgeddaboutit.

$5.00

 

I am running for Internet President of the United States.

The issue of abortion, while important. is a secondary issue that distracts Americans from the real issue which is the size of the federal government. 

Yes, the Feds are more than happy to have you fight over abortion out as they rob the American people through the waging of useless wars.

It is clever sleight of hand.

As we battle over abortion and other social issues, the federal government grows by leaps and bounds.

As the federal government grows, polarization of wealth increases, poverty increases and the desire for abortion becomes rampant.

What is my position on abortion?

My public position on abortion is irrelevant.  

Your public position on abortion is irrelevant.

Abortion is an issue that does not belong in the political arena, but the personal one.

There can never be any agreement on the issue of abortion.

There can be no agreement because the issue of abortion deals with you, your value system, and when you believe life begins.

Your experience in this world is unique. As such your view of abortion will be quite different from anyone else’s.

We will never come to any agreement on abortion, nor will the Supreme Court.

No one will ever invent a test that says:  Aha, meaningful life has begun!

As such the Supreme Court must necessarily sit on this fence post when it comes to abortion.

The Supreme Court must neither encourage nor discourage abortion.

The battle for abortion belongs in the personal arena.

As such, anyone’s public position on abortion is irrelevant.

All government can do is ensure that if an abortion is to be done, it be done in a safe, effective and controlled manner by responsible healthcare professionals entrusted to  ensure that the person who is having the abortion has been provided with all available options prior to the abortion.

The people who are pro and anti-abortion can continue their fight to win the minds of the people in the personal arena.

As such legislation and court rulings that either encourage or discourage abortion must be nullified.

Failure to do so will result in one generation leapfrogging over another with no satisfactory results.  And as the federal government grows, no one will be satisfied as the federal government will mandate what our position on abortion must be.

Accepting abortion as a legal option is not necessarily a capitulation by the pro-life constituency but rather a decision to focus on creating a viable decentralized economic society wherein abortion is not sought.

This will not be possible with a stronger federal government.

 

Support Donation

Did you like the column? How about a buck? Thanks much.

$1.00

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Copyright 2019   Archer Crosley   All Rights Reserved

Why the New World Order Won’t Win

Support Donation

To support the time and effort in producing this blog, please make a small one-time donation. I will totally appreciate your contribution, but I only want you to make a donation if you think this is the very best stuff out there. Otherwise, fuhgeddaboutit.

$5.00

 

If the NWO Is so smart, and if they control everything, why haven’t they taken over the world by now?  They’ve had plenty of time.

And if they control the media, why do we keep finding out about them?  Aren’t they smart enough to cover that up?

Why don’t they buy up YouTube and shut down all the conspiracists?

Shouldn’t that be a snap?

These are good questions.

First, why don’t the elites control everything by now if they are so smart?  Yes, the elites are totally smart. Unfortunately for them, they are totally immoral.  It is their total immorality that keeps them from gaining full control.  That is because we live in a moral universe.  

The basic fabric of the universe, the threads that bind us, is moral behavior.  As they gain in power through immoral means, the fabric expands thus pushing moral pressure away from them and into the surrounding areas where they are not.  This increase in moral pressure then creates new walls and obstacles that the elites must now overcome. 

In other words they shoot themselves in the foot.

Addiionally, the world changes.  Physically the earth hurtles through the heavens creating new problems and new boundaries.  We are constantly being exposed to new gravitational forces and cosmic radiation which affects the geography and climate.  This in turn affects us.

As we change the elites must change.

As for buying up YouTube or other social media and shutting us down, the same argument above applies.  Plus, one of the driving forces for creating social media is to keep track of people, to monitor their subversive activities, to see what people are thinking. The elites can not have their cake and eat it too.  This helps explain why the elites do not take down the craziest of the craziest web sites. 

There is overwhelming anti-Semitic discussion on YouTube, far worse than anything Alex Jones ever produced. So why is this material still there? It’s there for the elites to know who is producing it, and who is WATCHING it.  

They want it there.

But if they do shut down a web site – if it gets too close to the truth – the web site or data therein will ultimately find its way to other means of expression provided it is moral.

We live in a moral universe. That’s the short answer.

Now, why are the elites immoral?  Because they set themselves up as elites.  It’s a definitional thing. If they behaved morally they wouldn’t be elite.  Their eliteness comes about through immoral behavior.

These elites are social Darwinists.  They are so because they’re smart yet not insightful. Their superior intelligence allows them to accumulate vast sums of money. Their accumulation of vast sums of money compels them to ask why this must be so.  Rejecting God’s grace – a silly concept to them –  or their own inherent immorality as an answer, they come to see themselves as superior beings and thus God himself. Thus they continue their growth and domination until the inevitable death of their cancerous empire centuries into the future.

Why are they blind to their future destruction?

One, as human beings they have limited life spans; as such they know they will not be alive, and so they don’t care. 

Two, they care as little for their future generations as they do for the people around them.  

Three, they live for the here and now.  An after life does not exist for them; therefore, an accountability before God does not exist.

So the elites push on mindlessly, like an animal forever chasing its tail,  causing havoc, living in the present, trying to control a world that keeps eluding them, the world forever one step ahead.

 

Support Donation

Did you like the column? How about a buck? Thanks much.

$1.00

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Copyright 2019   Archer Crosley   All Rights Reserved

Yep, We Protected Him

 

Support Donation

To support the time and effort in producing this blog, please make a small one-time donation. I will totally appreciate your contribution, but I only want you to make a donation if you think this is the very best stuff out there. Otherwise, fuhgeddaboutit.

$5.00

 

Hi,

I am excepting this following passage from the book, The Brilliant Disaster, by Jim Rasenberger.

 

Castro was still of the zoo when the crowds began to gather in Central Park. By four-thirty, the area in front of the bandshell was thronged. At six, police began to muster. The NYPD brought in nearly a thousand officers, including dozens on horseback. Lookouts were posted on Central Park West rooftops to watch for snipers. Powerful searchlights scanned the trees and “flickered over the scene like heat lightning,” according to the New York Times, “turning the leaves pale violet and brilliant green and the trunks of the trees a luminous white.”

 

I just began reading this book; and as many of you may know by now, I am fascinated by the JFK Assassination.

This book concerns Castro, JFK and the history of that era between Cuba and the US.

One of the things I enjoy reading about are the interesting tidbits that you find along the way.  On this page, Mr. Rasenberger talks about Castro’s visit to New York.

Now, as you read this, imagine how history would have turned out had JFK received even one-tenth the protection in Dealey Plaza that Castro received in New York.  No, forget about one-tenth; how about one-hundredth?

Yep, we protected him all right.

We did our best.

What do you think?

 

Support Donation

Did you like the column? How about a buck? Thanks much.

$1.00

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Copyright 2019   Archer Crosley   All Rights Reserved