Asleep at the Wheel

I must admit that I was asleep at the wheel for most of my young adult life.

I don’t think I was stupid, although I most certainly was; it’s just that I was more focused on getting through college and medical school than in paying close attention to world affairs.

I remember watching the talking heads discuss issues on Sunday morning talk shows. The experts bandied out words and phrases such as detente and mutual assured destruction, but these terms were passing strangers in the night.

They were visitors who had stopped into the motel of my mind for the evening; they were there for a cup of coffee.

In the morning they were gone.

I was hopelessly naïve.

I actually believed that anyone could grow up to be President of the United States.

I believed in the Constitution of the United States.

I still do.

It’s too bad that our leaders do not.

For if they did, the people of United States might have a chance in this world.

They might actually have a say so in what goes on in their country.

But they do not.

Your country, my country, is not ruled by us.

It is ruled by an uncaring oligarchy – the Harvard Cartel.

Like Caligula of old, the Cartel cares principally for itself, its members, and their bank accounts.

They puff themselves up with meaningless awards while homelessness abounds in our inner cities. cities.

Many of you would like to know what will happen in the future.

Will we go to war in Ukraine?

Will the banking sector collapse?

Will the stock market boom?

What about cryptocurrency?

Will it collapse? Or will it soar?

What factors will determine what happens?

My jaded eyes, and my experience in life, has taught me this: Whatever happens will happen because the ruling elite, the Harvard Cartel, has decided that it will happen.

There is no way of predicting what they will do.

If they want us to go to war with Ukraine, it will happen.

If they don’t want us to go to war with Ukraine, it will not happen.

Likewise with the stock market and cryptocurrency.

If they want cryptocurrency to collapse, that is exactly what will happen

If they don’t want it to happen, then it won’t happen.

Yes, they have that kind of power.

Not only do they control the government, they control the minds of men.

Yes, yes, yes, I know, you are an intelligent person who has free will to make your own decisions.

Maybe you know many people who think like you, and you know for sure things that will happen.

I can assure you that you are in the minority. And, you are making a critical mistake by thinking that just because you think that it will happen that it will happen.

You’re wrong.

What happens will have nothing to do with what you think.

I don’t care if you have 30 million people on your side, what happens will happen because the ruling elite says it will happen.

They control the minds of men.

You may have thirty million people who think like you, but the ruling elite control the minds of hundreds of millions of people in the United States.

I don’t care if you have 100% of the truth on your side.

The ruling elite can promote a lie in the minds of hundreds of millions of people and defeat you with two hands behind their back.

It won’t even be a contest.

If the entire country seems to be against the war in Ukraine, our elite only need to create a false flag in which 25,000 Americans lose their lives at the hands of the Russians (of course), and you will have American intervention in Ukraine overnight.

If our ruling elite want the stock market to boom tomorrow, they can do it.

They can manufacture an artificial boom, and then use their media to promote that happy times are here again.

The masses will dutifully follow.

You won’t be able to do anything about that because you are a minnow, and they are a whale.

And whales tend to win.

You are along for the ride.

You are outnumbered.

But all is not lost. There are things that you can do.

You can choose to lead a moral life.

You can choose not to spend all your time on TikTok.

You can choose to devote more of your life to scholarship.

You can treat your friends and family with greater consideration.

You can choose not to eat corporate foods that make you obese.

You can lesson the amount of time that you permit mainstream media to lie to you.

You can begin voting for candidates who are regular people, who do not owe their livelihood to the Harvard Cartel.

You can write a letter to the pigs at Levi Strauss, and ask them why they are exploiting the people of Haiti, who only make five dollars a day – max.

You can choose to not send your children to Harvard university.

You can choose to donate $25 to a charity.

You can do many, many things that will make a difference in your life.

And making a difference in your life will ultimately impact what happens in Ukraine, what happens in the stock market.

One individual can change the world, but to do so you must focus on yourself.

Forget about these pricks in the government.

Forget about the press and the Harvard Cartel.

They don’t care about you at all.

You’re not going against Jesus by thinking such.

In fact, Jesus would approve of you walking away from the ruling class.

Render unto me what is mine, says Jesus; render unto Caesar what is Caesars.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Junkies

What do Alex Murdaugh and our leadership in the United States have in common?

Give up?

They are both junkies.

Are you following the Alex Murdaugh trial?

If not, a little background might be necessary.

Alex Murdaugh is accused of killing his wife and son at his home in South Carolina. Alex Murdaugh is an attorney who hails from a family with an impressive pedigree in what is known as the Low Country in South Carolina.

The prosecutors are claiming that Alex Murdaugh killed his wife for money.

Alex Murdaugh had a drug habit that was costing him approximately $50,000 a week.

To finance his drug habit, he was stealing money from his law firm.

And his clients.

When his clients received a big judgment – in the millions – Alex would pocket more than his fair share of the money.

In addition to his habit, Alex was also under financial stress because of a pending lawsuit against his son, Paul, who had gotten himself involved in a boating accident.

A young girl, Mallory Beach, was killed in that boating accident, and the belief was that Alex’s son, Paul, was driving the boat.

The boat belonged to Alex Murdaugh.

To compound the issue, Alex Murdaugh’s other son, Buster, had loaned Paul his driver’s license in order to buy beer illegally the night of the boating accident.

Thus there were many lawsuits filed against the Murdaugh family – criminal and civil.

The civil suit was asking for tens of millions of dollars.

The prosecutors claim that the financial pressure of the impending lawsuit and Alex’s drug habit caused Alex to kill his wife and son.

The thinking goes that if Paul is dead, the lawsuit goes away – or at least becomes mitigated. If his wife is dead, Alex gets to keep any of her money for himself.

The case doesn’t look good for Alex Murdaugh.

The prosecution has an amazing stash of evidence that implicates him.

If his attorneys can get him out of this trial with minimal damage then they are truly Houdinis of the court room.

Buster is supporting his father.

Buster is emotionally attached to his father.

I am not surprised at all.

It’s difficult to believe that Alex would kill his son. I can understand a husband killing his wife, but it is difficult for me to believe that a father would kill his son unless he was truly psychotic.

Alex Murdaugh does not appear to be organically psychotic.

Nevertheless, the evidence is strong against him.

But assuming that one day he is proven to be guilty, then he will be formally convicted of destroying his family.

And this is why Alex Murdaugh is so similar to our leaders in the Harvard Cartel who have hijacked our federal government.

Alex Murdaugh is a junkie who was addicted to opioids.

Our leaders are junkies who are addicted to war.

Both Alex Murdaugh and our leaders are drug addicts.

Both have destroyed their families.

Both have destroyed their reputations.

Both have poisoned the community in which they live.

This is what drugs does to people.

Drugs consume you.

Drugs distort your mind.

This is what has happened to the United States of America.

The leaders of the United States of America, consumed by war, have committed domestic abuse against its citizens.

They have raped the American public, they have stolen from the American public, they have abused the American public in order to feed their drug habit.

And they are addicted.

Their addiction to war is insatiable.

They are killing the United States of America.

By spending all the family money on Ukraine and the Middle East, they have failed to keep up with the infrastructure needs of our country.

They have failed to develop an affordable comprehensive healthcare system for working class people.

They have failed to control massive immigration.

They outsourced well paying jobs.

They substituted outsourced jobs with low paying jobs at Starbucks and Amazon.

By outsourcing well paying jobs, they destabilized the family unit thus causing depression, divorce, spousal abuse, child abuse, and all sources of social ills. This in turn created an opioid crisis.

They replaced a faith based culture with that which places its faith in gambling, celebrities, tattoos, and cheap gossip.

They are bankrupting the United States of America through endless war.

Just as Alex Murdaugh ruined his family financially, so have the leaders of the United States ruined its people financially.

They are all junkies.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Hate Speech is Vital 2

The biggest argument against hate speech is that hate speech was used in Nazi Germany.

So-called knowledgeable people say that it was hate speech that led to the persecution and killing of the Jews.

I disagree.

The problem with Nazi Germany was not that there was hate speech but that there was not enough hate speech.

Had the German people not been cowed into a state of timidity, they could have easily engaged in hate speech against the government (Hitler) which had a monopoly on hate speech.

And exercised it.

Consequently, no one was able to challenge the government. Ergo, millions upon millions of Jews, and other people, were executed.

The same will happen here in the United States if this current rage of political correctness and crusade against hate speech is ultimately successful.

Is that what you want?

That is where we are heading.

We are not heading toward Nirvana and a perfect world.

No, not at all.

Hate speech is integral to a thriving republic.

Empires not so much.

In fact hate speech is the enemy of empire because empires, being fundamentally and historically immoral, are predicated upon obedience – blind obedience.

In empire, blind obedience and allegiance must be given to the top guy.

No one must question war and the killing of innocent people which the top guy promotes because a) he must answer to his backers, and b) he’s too incompetent to wage peace.

No one must question theft, plunder, and robbery of other nations.

No one must question the hate he wages against a minority group to cover for his failings.

In empire, criticism of the top guy is considered hate speech.

Whatever the top guy degrees is gospel. Any criticism of that gospel is hate speech.

One must not even point out that the cronies of the top guy are crooks.

That is considered hate speech.

A republic on the other hand welcomes hate speech.

A republic has no fear of hate speech because a republic is pluralistic.

A republic enjoys decentralized power.

A republic respects all peoples and gives all people a voice no matter how abhorrent.

A republic is not predicated upon fear.

A republic thrives on trust.

A republic is strong enough and big enough to accept an insult.

An empire is not so inclined.

An empire is petty and weak.

An empire is predicated upon fear and distrust.

An empire respects no one’s opinion and gives no one a voice no matter how small the voice.

An empire fears its people.

The leaders of the empire sequester themselves away behind walls.

Republic is open and has no need of walls.

There was once a time in America, when America was a republic, when America did not fear its citizens, when America tolerated people with a different voice, when America tolerated hate speech.

That time in America is gone.

America, the republic is gone.

America is now a ruthless, petty empire that beats the living tar out of anyone who even slightly challenges its dominance.

America now brooks no dissent.

It locks away in perpetuity truth speakers like Julian Assange.

Like Nazi Germany.

This is not a pretty sight.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2023 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Wrong Thinking

So there were secret commandos with shoot to kill orders there at the Capitol on 1/6?

I don’t think our Congress gets it. If you need to have secret commandos to protect politicians, then you’re doing something wrong.

That’s the take home message.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2022 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Value of Honor

Right now, right at this moment, I am watching a ceremony on television that I watched as a child when I visited Washington, DC.

I am at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and soldiers are walking through the ceremony.

The soldiers are immaculately dressed, and they perform admirably.

It is a beautiful ceremony, but I must guard myself to not take the wrong lessons away from it.

Washington can seduce you when you visit there.

There are many memorials and monuments worth seeing.

They represent the history of our country, and it is a country that we can be proud of.

But these monuments also have the power to destroy.

Many of these monuments were built by Americans of a different generation who did not think the way we now think.

Our country has drifted far from its religious underpinnings.

When our antecedents built memorials, God, and all the good that God represents, was foremost in their minds.

The power of Caesar was not.

And yet, the white marble, the vastness of the buildings, their sheer weight and size, can so be easily misconstrued as to what these monuments represent.

Lincoln was a godly man who was not so much concerned as to whether God was on his side but whether he was on God’s side.

His memorial must convey that.

As must the others.

But we are not of Lincoln’s era.

Nor that of the Founding Fathers.

And so these monuments have taken on a different meaning.

They are now a catalogue of sites that Americans check off as part of an indoctrination program into America’s might and power.

Our news media forever crows about America as the most powerful nation on earth.

As do our leaders.

The President of the United States is regularly feted as the most powerful man on the face of the earth.

Did Lincoln shower himself with such illusions?

The monuments are now part of the supporting cast to justify our Presidents’ decisions on waging war around the globe.

The monuments sanctify us, purify us, justify us.

But that was not their intent when they were first constructed.

Monuments and memorials do not exist for war. Nor do they exist to create heroes.

Nor do they serve as a pretext for vengeance or domination.

They exist to deliver a message.

Those men who sacrificed their lives as in the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier are talking to us.

They want to tell us something.

They are asking us to dedicate our lives to forging a better world than the one that took their life.

As Lincoln said in the Gettysburg address:

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Unelected Cabal

Why do I rail against the Harvard cabal?

Is there something wrong with me?

No.

Aside from being given a mission by God (not my choice) to destroy Harvard University, I rail against Harvard University because they are an unelected cabal.

They have no authority or mandate to hijack the government of the United States of America which is exactly what they’ve done.

If the Founding Fathers had desired a so-called elite institution like Harvard University to rule the country, then why didn’t they cut to the chase and set things up that way?

I think it’s a good bet that they didn’t do that because they didn’t want things set up that way.

The Founding Fathers were very wary of replacing one tyrant with another.

That’s why they set up a system of checks and balances. It makes sense, right? They wanted to disseminate power, not concentrate it.

It probably didn’t occur to them that a university which is supposed to be knowledgeable, thoughtful, and intelligent would embark upon a mission of arrogant tyranny.

Isn’t that amazing when you think of it – that a school that one would think would be knowledgeable about empire, tyranny, and why civilizations thrive and collapse, would desire to recapitulate Rome.

Now, if Harvard University is so smart, as many of you think it is, then why is Harvard not smart enough to not do what they are doing.

Doesn’t Harvard understand that when you place too many people in power who come from one institution or a small group of similar thinking institutions that you produce an inbreeding of thought that will ultimately engender an inflexibility and ossification of society that restricts its ability to adapt?

And isn’t that precisely what we are seeing in the United States of America today.

As our leadership has ossified under the death grip of Harvard University, other countries who have relaxed their totalitarian ways have moved ahead of us.

Is that what we want?

It’s not what I want.

I want to see the United States of America adhere to the principles of the Founding Fathers.

I am not interested in a Supreme Court justice musing about it. I want it to be so.

Well, we are never going to get there unless Harvard University is defeated.

That’s why I rail against Harvard University.

They are destroying the United States of America.

We can’t have America the country and America the empire at the same time. It’s impossible. We can have one or the other but not both.

And if we can’t have a country, then what’s the point of the empire?

If Harvard can’t understand that, then Harvard must go.

Based upon its lack of understanding, its lack of insight, Harvard University has proven itself to not be comprised of the best and brightest.

In which case, again, Harvard must go.

The sooner the better.

Harvard has made a mockery of the Founding Fathers and the Constitution.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Forget Democracy

Maybe the form of government doesn’t mean as much as we think it does.

As long as people believe or trust stupid things, what’s the point?

As long as people a) worship money, b) idolize celebrities c) believe that people who graduate from certain schools are of superior intelligence, can any form of government save us?

Suppose we had kings and queens, but people were of the mindset that freely congregating during COVID-19 while protecting the elderly was the way to protect ourselves, would we be better off?

Of course.

Well, instead we had sham democracies that were “elected” by powerful international cabals who control large multinational corporations.

These large multinational corporations control the media that effectively propagandize people and make them believe that lockdowns and masks will protect them.

Now the people are ingrained into believing that a yearly booster will protect them which is good for the corporations.

Lots of money there, eh’

So, here we have a theoretically superior system – democracy – that is supposed to make life better for us. But it hasn’t.

Why hasn’t this supposedly superior form of government called democracy worked?

Because the elites have programmed the people into believing that people who graduate from Harvard, MIT and Oxford are the best and the brightest.

Because the people follow celebrity-demigods like Dr. Tom Hanks who tell them to stay at home.

Because the people listen intently to billionaires like Bill Gates who clearly must be smarter than the rest of us because he’s accumulated so much money.

It made total sense that treating a number like an R-naught value would force the virus down on its knees and cry uncle, right?

Sure.

Perhaps we might be better off in spending less time on the form of government and more time on the myths that people believe.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Right Fight

Once again I shall talk about Julian Assange.

I think it’s important to bring up his case from time to time because Assange sits in a prison today at the behest of the United States government and in particular ignorant fools like Mike Pompeo, sell out artist extraordinaire, who sold his soul to the elites for a few pieces of silver.

Julian Assange’s crime was to expose the criminality of our elites as they fought wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Assange had the courage to do what Arthur Ochs Sulzberger of the New York Times did not have the courage to do.

Assange reported the truth.

His most notable exposition was that of helicopter personnel gunning down innocent civilians in Iraq and then joking about it.

The government ultimately accused Assange of helping to steal government documents.

Of course, they haven’t proven that yet. Nevertheless Assange sits in Belmarsh prison in the UK waiting for extradition back to the United States.

The UK can always be counted on to partner with the United States in criminality because the UK taught our elites how to conduct this criminality. The UK had a head start on the United States and has conducted its criminal enterprise of exploitation, theft and murder for over five centuries now.

In that regard, the United States is a mere child, an eager novice learning at its mother’s feet.

Given that Assange will be tried in an American court, it would seem logical that he should enjoy the rights of an American citizen even though he is Australian by birth.

As an aside, though he is an Australian by birth, by his actions and his courage he is more American than most of us. I will include myself in that.

Because he has been incarcerated for well over a year, because the Sixth Amendment grants us the right to a speedy trial, Julian Assange’s Sixth Amendment rights have been conclusively violated.

This is not important to our elites who claim to defend the Bill of Rights.

I find it ironic that Assange is currently housed in a prison in the United Kingdom, for it was that criminal nation that imprisoned many of our ancestors before they immigrated to the United States.

That’s why our ancestors came here.

They wanted a better way of life.

They didn’t want to be imprisoned in the Tower of London upon the whim of the queen or king.

They didn’t want to be impaled on the city walls of London as was the case up until the 19th century.

They didn’t want their children to grow up in a Dickensian workhouse.

They didn’t want to bow and curtsy before a queen.

They didn’t want government to fight endless wars, certainly not as an economic model.

And they sure didn’t want a government that would violate our basic inalienable rights.

That’s why they articulated the Bill of Rights which are the crown jewels of the United States of America.

The Bill of Rights is what we talk about and what we fight about. It is who we are as Americans.

One of those rights is free speech which is what Assange engaged in.

The other right is the right to a speedy trial which has been denied to Julian Assange.

Without that right, the government can keep us incarcerated for life which I suppose is what they plan to do to Assange.

Why have a trial? The trial is now unnecessary without the Sixth Amendment being adhered to.

This is great for the ruling class.

But for the rest of us, not so much.

This is why it’s important to remember Julian Assange.

The fight for his freedom could not be more important.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Presentative Democracy

Do you believe that representative democracy is the ultimate form of government?

I don’t.

I think it’s a terrible form of government.

The elites figured out how to rig elections pretty much the day after they came into being.

Did you know that Napoleon and his brothers rigged elections in France?

That was 200 years ago.

Not only did they rig the elections and plebiscites, they were brazen enough to rig them with rounded number victories: 16 million to 4 million.

Forget about the fine-toothed comb.

Why bother with precision?

But even if elections weren’t rigged, why would we want a dope who knows nothing about the issues to cancel out our vote because some Boss Tweed type clown bought him a barbecue sandwich?

This is the problem we have with elections today.

Actually, it’s worse.

No longer do the elites have to mess with paid voters showing up at the polls.

With our “advanced” voting machines, the elites can remotely program the votes in with the click of a button.

It’s unhealthy.

The politicians will gladly help that criminality along by assuring that voter identification not be required at the polling booth.

Clearly the politicians and the elites who control them desire the system to be this way.

Since they do, what does that say about them?

What does that say about representative democracy?

This invites the question as to why politicians should be voted into office in the first place.

We don’t elect cardiologists.

We don’t elect bakers.

We don’t elect carpenters.

Instead we vote with our feet.

Instead of a formally electing someone, we actively use the people who we say offer the best service.

So why don’t we do that in politics?

Why don’t we jettison this idea of electing one guy to represent us every two to four years?

Maybe we can devise a different model in which to get things done.

What would this system look like?

To get things done any citizen could petition a professional (specialist) who has gone to school for handling that specific common function that we currently entrust to the government. Let’s say that we want to widen the intersection near our office so that it can accommodate a dedicated right hand turn.

Once that specialist is petitioned, a mechanism is set in place so that other petitioners can either join in or oppose the petition.

This petition after a certain period of time can then be adjudicated by professional judges that are agreed upon by the specialists.

In this matter, citizens can then make changes to their city or neighborhood that they feel are important and relevant.

None of these specialists or judges would be subject to being elected. They would go to school to gain expertise.

There could be specialists for schools, specialists for roads, specialists for healthcare, education, specialists for what have you.

Accordingly there would be judges for these areas of expertise.

The mayor, and the commissioners would be a thing of the past.

What would be the consequences of such a system?

What would be the upside? What would be the downside?

Theoretically, we should have greater expertise and better decision making by virtue of having specialists take care of various issues.

We trade in the bloated, corrupt jack of all trades for a lean, clean machine of expertise.

Secondly, we decide issues on their own merits, not by compromising other areas.

Currently, if we want to improve our schools, we have to give in on other issues. We can’t just improve our schools; we have to give the mayor’s buddy the concrete job for the new highway even though doing so may be a really bad idea.

So if we moved to this new system, gone would be the giant omnibus bill in which congressman can throw in their pork.

But maybe that’s not a good thing. Maybe pork and fat is good.

Maybe people need that pork to provide needed jobs that otherwise can’t be gotten.

That is something we would have to think about.

But it’s worth trying.

It’s worth trying because the current system isn’t working.

Representative democracy doesn’t work because the key weak link is the representative himself.

If the representative is bought off by corporate interests, which is what’s going on today, then democracy can’t possibly work.

Within a democracy that’s controlled by people who can present their case directly to a specialist, let’s call it presentative democracy, we might stand a better chance.

Of course, the specialists and judges can be bought off, but by decreasing their range and scope, we might be able to limit the damage they can do.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Dwight Eisenhower, American Quisling

No one did more damage in the modern era to the American experiment than Dwight Eisenhower.

He was and is an American Quisling.

He betrayed the values of the Founding Fathers which are rooted in a decent Christianity that respects and values other people.

Throughout the 1950s when Alan Dulles and John Foster Dulles were tear-assing around the globe committing much naughtiness against sovereign nations, Dwight Eisenhower stood by and gave his tacit approval.

In 1953 we overthrew the government of Iran.

In 1954 we overthrew the government of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala.

Throughout the 1950s Ike set the table for what would become the Vietnam war in which millions of people died.

He aggravated the government of Indonesia which was finally replaced in 1965. The man, Suharto, that our CIA installed, killed one million communists. The CIA was not ashamed.

Ike tried like hell to kill Patrice Lamumba of the Congo. Who cares about the Congo? Everybody cares about the Congo. The Congo is the most valuable piece of real estate in the world.

When Lamumba leaned (you only need to lean) toward the commies, our leaders decided to deep six him.

Many of the problems that we face today, such as our ongoing conflict with Iran, our massive immigration problems coming from Central America, can be laid at the feet of Dwight Eisenhower.

The entire debacle of Vietnam could have been avoided had Eisenhower taken an enlightened approach to their desire for independence.

Eisenhower though became another President in the long line of Presidents who kneeled before corporate power.

That Ike warned us of the military industrial complex is a joke.

Sorry, my friend, you don’t get points by fucking me over and then warning me about yourself when you’re ready to retire.

Ike was the military industrial complex and had been his entire life.

He was groomed to lead.

In the Philippines he was Douglas MacArthur‘s assistant.

In World War II he was commander of the armies.

For crying out loud, he became the President of the United States.

In short, Ike was the military industrial complex.

When Joe McCarthy reported on communists at Fort Monmouth, what was Ike’s response?

Was Ike gratified that Joe McCarthy had exposed an espionage ring at Fort Monmouth?

Not at all.

Not only did Ike not appreciate McCarthy’s efforts, he worked behind the scenes to destroy Joe McCarthy.

What Joe McCarthy was really revealing to the American people was that our government was acting contrary to the positions they would state publicly, contrary to the dreams and aspirations of the American people, and contrary to the principles of the Founding Fathers as they embodied them in the Constitution.

It’s fair to say that the American people are primarily interested in the welfare of the American people, as they should be, as any citizen of any country should be regarding their own country.

Ike betrayed the American people.

Like Truman, like George C Marshall, Ike bowed down to corporate interests.

He and his ilk were globalists.

In those days we called them communists.

Today we understand more fully that there is no real difference between communism, fascism, crony capitalism and corporate socialism. It’s all the same.

Ike placed corporate money above the welfare of the American people.

He ruthlessly prosecuted an unnecessary and fruitless Cold War that expanded the government, enlarged the military, and enriched the corporations and their leaders far beyond what any actual war could produce.

If Franklin Roosevelt was the architect of corporate tyranny, surely Dwight Eisenhower was its general contractor.

He was an American Quisling.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved