The Big Slide

How did the big slide in America occur?

It occurred before our eyes without us even knowing it.

And we did it to ourselves. It wasn’t done without our help.

It began of course with the generation preceding World War II. This would be the generation of my grandfather, the World War I generation.

They truly lived in the America that was, the America that is currently referred to as racist and bigoted.

They would have no ability to survive in our world today. They would not understand it at all.

It was about this time – in the early 1920s – that our elites got together and began the grand transformation of America into a neo-feudalist state modeled on the feudalist state of old.

Our elites of course never liked the American experiment.

The American experiment gave regular people a window.

It wasn’t just a window for people to excel and live a good life; it was a window of revelation demonstrating to regular people that they were just as good as the elites.

The elites viewed this revelation as dangerous.

What really galled the elites was that the American experiment was working. Not only was America prospering, it was prospering above and beyond the old system of Europe.

This is why America became a beacon to the world. This is why people came to America.

To combat this, European nobility, particularly British nobility, began their attempt to rope America back into the feudalist mindset of thinking.

It was always the dream of Cecil Rhodes to get America back into the fold.

He was enabled in his quest by his newly enriched friends, the social climbing robber barons, and of course, his friends at Harvard University.

Harvard University has never been a friend of the American experiment.

From day one, Harvard has worked against average Americans and the idea that regular people are just as important as so-called elite people.

Harvard was more than willing to help Cecil Rhodes corral Americans back into the royalist fold.

Harvard embraced the Rhodes scholarship. Harvard embraces the Rhodes Scholarship today. When Harvard had its 350th anniversary, who did Derek Bok, the then president of Harvard, invite as a vital speaker to his ceremony? None other than Prince Charles.

Harvard is an elitist institution.

Its grandiose graduation ceremony where the wealthy elite congratulate themselves in opulence while homelessness (that Harvard engendered) abounds is a national embarrassment.

Harvard leads the Ivy League. It is the oldest school in the nation. It is older than our Constitution.

The Ivy League exists to train the officers of Corporate America.

Corporate America runs America and Harvard controls Corporate America.

Corporate America is comprised of not just corporations, but foundations, associations, thank tanks, major media, sports leagues, major entertainment, and of course the government.

It is that Corporate America fueled by Harvard University and the Ivy League that has engineered the demise of America.

As I said, they did it before our eyes. And with our help.

They did it through a series of crises that they created.

They created WWI, they created the Great Depression, they created World War II.

They have created every debacle since then.

These crises gave them the opportunity to further increase the power of the federal government, to take control of America’s businesses, to foment nonstop war abroad, to exploit other peoples, to dumb down the population, to weaken the population through drugs, gambling, cheap gossip and crummy celebrity culture.

They did it slowly and they did it in a very insidious manner.

Who would object? After all the leaders were solving a crisis.

To keep any skeptics at bay, their attempts at solving these crises were always wrapped within a cocoon of lies.

Subtle conments like Franklin Roosevelt being a traitor to his class was a pervasive lie intended to convince Americans that the government was on their side.

Of course, Franklin Roosevelt was not a traitor to his class at all. Franklin Roosevelt expanded the government through the Great Depression and World War II and in so doing transformed a small racket, the government, into a humongous racket from which his friends profited enormously.

His successors, particularly Dwight Eisenhower, fought a Cold War, created by the elites, engineered by the elites, to give us the current military industrial complex. That Dwight Eisenhower would warn us about the military industrial complex is a joke. Dwight Eisenhower was the military industrial complex.

How did our elites prosecute the Cold War?

First by creating a bogus bogeymen of communist domination, a force that had to be defeated.

Second, capitalist imperialism through exploitation and domination of other peoples. These efforts principally engineered by Allen Dulles with the full backing of Dwight Eisenhower, were anti-Christian and antithetical to the principles of the Founding Fathers.

The big lie was that Dwight Eisenhower was our friend. The big lie was Dwight Eisenhower himself.

Here was Dwight Eisenhower, a war hero, who won a war, World War II, that our elites were responsible for in the first place, who was now continuing that war against the evil Soviet Union.

The sad truth is that it was the United States that was the aggressive nation around the world.

It is so today.

All our major problems that we face today, the immigration from Central America, the enmity with Iran, the enmity with Venezuela can be laid at the feet of Dwight Eisenhower, our friend.

Ike overthrew Mosaddegh in Iran in 1953. His crime? He nationalized the British oil fields to give his people opportunities.

Ike overthrew Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954. His crime? He wanted to take a small amount of uncultivated land and give it to the peasants.

Ike played tricks and games with the Indonesians in the 1950s because Sukarno wanted to take a third way between capitalism and communism. Ike set the table. Finally in the mid 60s Sukarno was overthrown so that the United States could steal the assets of Indonesia for greedy pigs like Forbes Wilson of Freeport Sulphur. Our CIA helped Suharto, Sukarno’s replacement and our thug, kill 1 million of his opponents. CIA officers who helped Suharto are not ashamed of their actions.

The goal of our leaders has never been to help the people of the world or the people of the United States; it’s always been about exploitation for the purposes of profit making.

We didn’t go into Vietnam in order to help the people of Southeast Asia. We went into Vietnam in order to establish a presence, a beach head, in order to control the vital resources that the region possessed.

Of course, we already had the Philippines as a base from which to stage our operations, but Vietnam would give us a beach head on the mainland.

There were enormous assets in minerals, oil, and agriculture to be controlled. Latex, rubber, oil, gold and copper. The largest copper and gold mines were known to be in New Guinea.

It was vital that the United States control the region. This is how it was sold to my parents and grandparents. The thinking was that what was good for Corporate America was good for the citizens of the United States. That was another lie.

If we could save Vietnam, we could prevent the whole region from going communist. It was called the Domino Theory.

The problem with that theory is that it wasn’t necessarily so. The people there weren’t so much communist as they were nationalist. They wanted to control their own destiny. They wanted a piece of the pie. They didn’t want to be exploited.

Had we given them a stake in the game, we would have avoided the problems that we face today.

Of course, that was never the game plan of Allen Dulles and Dwight Eisenhower. Their goal was exploitation and domination. Why would we think otherwise? Dwight Eisenhower was Douglas MacArthur’s right hand man in the Philippines. It was plain enough for him to see that United States was never going to give Filipinos a stake in the game.

And so our elites moved in. They used every evil and malignant trick in the book to get their way. One of their favorite stratagems was to buy a dictator with money, have him spread the money to his cronies who would then control the population.

The United States owned legions of them around the globe. Machado, Batista, Trujillo, Baby Doc, Somoza, the Shah, Marcos, the list goes on and on.

This worked for a while until the people realized that they were being exploited.

Some rebelled, others never bought in from the get go.

One rebellion resulted in the Vietnam war.

Ike set the table there too.

The Vietnam war was tremendously damaging to the psyche of the United States and its people.

It produced a cynicism and distrust of our leaders which was well deserved.

It was more clear to the people that our leaders did not have their best interest at heart.

Concomitantly Americans began turning toward drugs. Baby boomers were young and willing to experiment. Disillusioned veterans were also willing to experiment. This was aided and abetted by our Central Intelligence Agency which helped import drugs into the United States. Yes, that’s right, our CIA made a deal with the drug lords in Southeast Asia to import drugs into the United States in exchange for them helping us in Vietnam.

Unfortunately, for the American people the weaker you are, the less able you are to fight back.

It didn’t take too long before the United States corporations began outsourcing jobs to these newly exploited nations.

What a winner for the elites. They now owned many servile countries around the globe to which they could export US labor.

They could not only break the backs of labor unions and the people of the United States of America, they could make a windfall of profits by paying people in Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, not to mention Central America peanuts for jobs that used to provide living wages for United States citizens.

As a result, many people in the United States lost their well paying jobs. This occurred across all sectors of industry in the United States.

A line worker at GM in 1970 could make about $75,000 per year in today’s money without a college education. A current Starbucks barista can make $30,000 a year if they’re lucky.

This produced a general lowering of standards for the American family. When the family is weakened financially, the family is weakened spiritually. This then produces social ills such as crime, drug use, drug abuse, spousal abuse, child abuse, psychological turmoil and a lower level of education

These changes occurred slowly before our eyes.

To combat this, our government did not stop outsourcing of jobs, nor did it make any serious attempt to curtail the drug trade. Those were money makers for the elites.

Our government gave us Band-Aids. They gave us gambling. They gave us cheap gossip. They gave us celebrity culture.

If a patient is in pain, a good doctor tries to find the root cause and fix that. A good doctor doesn’t give morphine and walk away.

Our government gave us morphine.

In addition to these worthless Band-Aids, the government permitted corporations to continue their ravaging of the American workplace.

Chief executive officers and their henchmen were permitted to control the board room so as to enrich themselves wildly beyond anyone’s dream as far as compensation packages were concerned. Not only did they give themselves exorbitant salaries and golden parachutes, they also awarded themselves millions of shares of stock. In essence, they raped the shareholder.

This continues to this day.

The focus then became to get rich,and most of the baby boomers being young got suckered into this movement.

The elites took advantage of our greed and desire to be rich in order to fuck the American republic.

We did it to ourselves.

We were blind.

This is why Oliver Stone made the movie Wall Street. He wanted to demonstrate the sickness in American society, what was wrong with American society.

We all watched Wall Street and thought it was a great movie, but it was a movie. We were busy making money and dreaming of getting rich, so we continued along our merry way.

As we moved through the 1980s and into the 90s we were seduced by Ronald Reagan, his successors and the concept of free trade. We became even more anti-communist. We fully bought into the evil empire that was Russia.

We didn’t see outsourcing of jobs as a bad thing. It was all sold under the lie of free trade. Free trade was looked at as anti-communist and anti-elitist, not for what it was, free imperialism.

Plus – the media controlled by the elites had thoroughly demonized the labor unions as corrupt.

We didn’t see the good in the Teamsters, only the bad.

We wanted the Teamsters gone.

Free Trade was embraced.

We didn’t see the damage that free trade was doing to the United States.

It was only when political correctness came into being under Bill Clinton‘s administration that we first began to get an idea that we had been had.

One could start to see where the elites were heading with all this.

Never to be out done the elites cleverly distracted us with the World Trade Center bombing. Once again we got roped into believing that yet another enemy of America was attacking us.

We responded by going whole hog into the Middle East. We never asked any questions. It was clear that these Muslims were attacking us because they didn’t like our way of life. We never asked what they would know about our way of life. We just bought the lie.

Many Americans buy into this lie today.

Am I losing you?

We now live in an Orwellian world. The elites lie with impunity. They rig elections openly.

The apotheosis of their lying nature finds itself in the coronavirus pandemic. From the beginning the elites have lied to us every step of the way.

Legitimate criticisms are censored. Flat out lies are told.

The COVID-19 crisis is being used to reengineer society, but not for the betterment of man, but for the economic benefits of the rich.

Our elites, our crony capitalists, hide behind Karl Marx and use him as a shield.

They have no desire for a grassroots socialism.

Oh, no, what they are after is a much bigger game – fascism.

Welcome to the New World Order.

We did it to ourselves.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Harvard’s Fatal Mistake

You’ll just have to follow my reasoning.

Harvard leads the Ivy League.

The Ivy League is responsible for training the officers of Corporate America.

The Ivy League does not exist to train workers at McDonald’s.

Corporate America is comprised of our major corporations, foundations, associations, sports leagues, major media, NGOs, and of course our government.

These organizations together control the United States of America, ergo Corporate America controls the United States of America.

Corporate America also controls the CIA. The head of the CIA typically but not always comes from an Ivy League school or a person who has bent the knee to the powers that be that are controlled by the Ivy League.

The CIA is a sneak that engineers Corporate America’s dirty tricks to achieve the aims of Corporate America.

They do it abroad. They do it in the United States.

Period.

At its core, Harvard is the de facto leader of the Ivy League which fuels Corporate America which controls the United States of America.

Harvard is the leader of the cabal.

Harvard is the oldest academic institution in United States. Harvard is older than the United States government itself. Harvard has build deep relationships in all walks of life. Harvard has many allies.

If there is a trend or a movement in the United States, it is because Harvard has ultimately sanctioned it. If Harvard doesn’t want it to exist, Harvard will crush it.

Harvard is the King Louis of our age.

King Louis ran France with an iron fist.

Harvard runs America with an iron fist.

Where Harvard is wrong is where King Louis was wrong.

Harvard believes that an immoral act can produce a moral end.

Harvard is wrong.

King Louis was wrong.

An immoral act can only produce an immoral end.

King Louis and his successors were eventually crushed.

So too will Harvard be crushed.

Its plans will not work.

It was Harvard of course who put the whole COVID-19 crisis into action.

Only a concerted effort spread over a broad swath of industries – Big Media, Big Pharma, Big Business, and Big Government – could have successfully prosecuted this COVID-19 crisis which did much harm to the American people, physically and financially.

Who benefitted?

Harvard, the Ivy League and the institutions they control.

The media personalities had to be coordinated to sell this disease. Big Pharma had to be readied to develop its vaccine. Phony scientists and doctors at major medical institutions like the New England Journal of Medicine had to be controlled. Major media had to be manipulated so as to censor discussion of alternative therapies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This major media had to be controlled from the national to the regional level.

Only an organization such as Harvard that has dominated and controlled our major institutions at all levels for decades if not centuries could have pulled this off.

The center of this cabal lies in Cambridge Massachusetts. In that small community lies Harvard and MIT. Harvard provided the expertise in governmental and corporate control; MIT provided the expertise and technical know how to not only manufacture the vaccine but to control the Internet.

Of course, Harvard has its willing allies across the globe.

This cabal is international.

Harvard has its dirty hooks in every country around the globe.

What we witnessed in the past year was a coup d’état of our way of living wherever you live.

What Harvard was saying to the world was this: We’re going to change things to what we want, and we don’t care what you think.

That’s the problem. That’s the fundamentally immoral part of their program.

A leader doesn’t get to operate without consent.

Harvard didn’t ask us what we wanted or what we thought.

That is why Harvard’s actions are immoral.

What is morality? What does it mean to be moral?

Of course, we can develop many definitions. Here’s the definition that I have used over the years.

A moral act is that which is maximally workable and optimal in the short and long run for all human parties concerned.

Now, of course, you may want to debate that and hash that out, and there is certainly a lot of wiggle room there, but it is the operating definition I’ve used for a long time.

But we can use whatever definition you have.

Regardless of whatever definition we use, our Founding Fathers were moral people who, unlike the cocksuckers who lead us today, based our Constitution on morality which dictated to them that government should operate out of consent.

Thus: We the People.

The first three words of the Constitution were not chosen randomly or on a whim.

These were words of dread and death to the British moles at Harvard University.

It’s called a government of consent.

We have to consent.

That’s a moral thing. It works in the short run and the long run for all of us.

Harvard University violates this consent.

Because of its long-standing violation of our most basic right, Harvard University is therefore an immoral institution.

You know it is.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Afghanistan

Who should we blame for Afghanistan?

Fox News clearly has hunkered down in its bunker to put the blame on Biden.

CNN responds by heaping the guilt on Trump.

Sigh.

It’s the same old game that the elites want to rope you into playing.

Republicans versus Democrats.

Please don’t get suckered.

Please don’t get conned.

Please don’t get hoodwinked or bamboozled.

What happened in Afghanistan is an indictment of the elites who control both parties.

Afghanistan was the creation of Corporate America who controls the political class lock stock and barrel.

Afghanistan, my friend, was another war created by Corporate America to make money for Corporate America.

Forget about the minerals in Afghanistan.

The real money, trillions of it, was made in fighting the war.

Welcome to the new reality.

The reality is that America’s economic model is war.

America is no longer a place where we make things. America is a place where we fight wars to enrich the elites.

It’s not just the defense contractors. It’s incorrect to pin it all on Raytheon.

Everybody makes money off war if you are a member of Corporate America.

McDonald’s makes money. Starbucks makes money.

Let me explain.

In order to fight a war in a jungle, Vietnam, in the mountains, Afghanistan, in a desert, Iraq, you have to re-create Corpus Christi Texas.

You have to create a city for 250,000 soldiers and civilian personnel.

That means that you have to create everything in the city from the streets to the ice cream bars.

Look at the room you are sitting in now and point to any object randomly. Wherever your finger points to, whether it’s gypsum board, a picture on the wall, a ceiling fan, tile on the floor, a television set, drinking glasses, pillows, window panes, all of those items are necessary.

Once you understand that, you understand why war is so attractive to Corporate America.

War is a make work project where everyone benefits. It’s very much like those ghost cities that China builds. You know what I’m talking about, right?

No?

China builds ghost cities, enormous cities that are unoccupied. They were built to make work for the workers.

In the United States we build cities also, but we build them in other countries when we go to war.

That’s our economic model, friend.

And now you know why war exists.

It doesn’t exist to win it anymore.

That’s why the wars last so fucking long.

Winning the war would mean the cash cow would end.

OMG, that would be terrible for the economy.

Beyond that, the elites take a disproportionate share of the trillions that are necessary to fight the war.

How do you think the rich got so rich?

Here’s a kicker for you. A cold war in which we don’t fight a war but instead build ships and bases because we are afraid of a war make even more money for the wealthy elites.

Peace through strength is the euphemism that the knuckleheads give it. Only it never leads to peace, not in the past or now.

Cold Wars are the elixir of life for the war gods.

That’s why Fox News and CNN are always drumming up the threat of Russia or China attacking us.

Who in fuck‘s name are they kidding?

None of these countries was ever a threat to America.

Do you want to know why?

Because we are oceans away from them.

In addition to that, our military spending is astronomically larger than theirs.

We are the biggest motherfuckers in the valley. That we should have to fear anyone is a joke.

Our biggest enemy is Corporate America.

Fox News and CNN both promote war. They love war. They loved the Afghanistan war.

They promoted the war because Corporate America wanted them to promote the war.

Corporate America owns them.

Corporate America also controls The New York Beobacter and The Washington Goebbels who also hawk for war.

Ditto to the Wall Street Fascist.

But none of them want you to know that it’s Corporate America that controls them.

So to distract you they play up the same old tiresome dog and pony show of Republicans versus Democrats.

As long as you are focused on this stupid Republicans versus Democrats sporting match that they promote, you will never understand that it’s Corporate America that is the enemy.

If you have a loved one who died in Afghanistan or Vietnam or any of the other useless wars America fights, I empathize with you.

If you want your loved one’s death or injury to count for something, let it count for this: The complete grinding into dust of Corporate America.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Doctrine of Fauci

Welcome to our Kim Jong-un society.

Welcome to a society where the supreme leader is infallible and can hear your thoughts.

Welcome to a society where the elites can say anything they want and pass it off as truth.

They can do this because their smiling serfs cheer everything that they say.

We now live under the Doctrine of Fauci.

It’s a completely ridiculous doctrine, but we live under it nevertheless.

We live under it because there are so many serfs.

They are many, and we are few.

The Doctrine of Fauci says that facemasks work, that lockdowns work, and that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the coronavirus than unvaccinated people.

That’s the truth according to Fauci whether we like it or not.

There’s no convincing the certain serfs.

They know.

In their fallout chambers they call apartments, masked up and terrified, they know.

It’s settled science.

Just like global warming, just like acid rain caused by cow farts, just like the new Ice Age that was predicted 50 years ago, just like the end of the world in 12 years that was predicted 3 years ago, it’s settled science.

It’s settled science because Dr. Fauci says so, and everybody knows that Dr. Fauci is the nation’s top infectious disease expert.

Except that he isn’t.

That’s only something that Jim Acosta and Wolf Blitzer believe in.

We don’t elect top infectious disease experts in healthcare in the United States.

In fact, top infectious disease experts are at the top because they say wise things.

Dr. Fauci says unwise things.

Dr. Fauci says that hydroxychloroquine is dangerous.

Never mind the thousands of dermatologists and rheumatologists who have been using it safely for decades.

Dr. Fauci, a year ago said that herd immunity was almost impossible.

Well of course it is if you lock everybody up in their house.

But if you don’t lock everyone up in their house, and you allow the healthy to congregate with each other and share the virus, they will become immune and more likely to protect the elderly.

Herd immunity in the clinical world is a process not an end point. It is the progressive development of herd immunity that acts to protect the elderly. It works like a clasp knife. You slowly close the knife until you reach a critical point at which the knife suddenly snaps shut.

Herd Immunity works in this manner, only Dr. Fauci and the elites didn’t allow us to go down that path.

Children who are remarkably resilient to the disease are an important part of that herd immunity.

Dr. Fauci allowed corporate media to promote the myth that children were at risk. This was untrue. Children were never at any serious risk of dying from COVID-19 as you are currently now seeing.

Dr. Fauci and his frothing cheerleaders say that ivermectin doesn’t work.

OK.

Then it doesn’t.

Except that it is a valuable adjunctive medicine in the armamentarium against COVID-19.

Dr. Fauci says that super-spreader events can occur when people get together for a picnic.

He says that these events cause infection by respiratory droplet transmission.

Except that they don’t occur that way.

Super-spreader events occur because people don’t wash their hands.

The facemask is worthless.

The guests at Amy Coney Barrett’s reception got COVID-19 most likely because they shook hands and then ate hors d’oeuvres without washing their hands first.

In the background of her reception, the American flag was gently moving at about 2 to 3 mph (about 2.9 to 4.4 feet per second). This means that almost all of the coughed and sneezed viruses would have quickly dispersed through the atmosphere.

It’s very unlikely that a sneezed virus would make a beeline into someone else’s trachea and overcome the non-adaptive immune defenses of that individual.

Handwashing was what was needed.

If we’d had a top infectious disease expert, he would’ve promoted a first rate handwashing campaign instead of the silly face mask.

Never mind that though.

Never mind the fact that we could’ve been through with this pandemic with 150,000 US dead had we not done a lockdown, had we not engaged in the facemask, had we not opposed any reasonable medicines that might’ve helped people.

What’s most important is that Dr. Fauci is right and that the serfs have someone to cheer for.

Dr. Fauci’s infallibility must be maintained otherwise the emaciated serfs might lose heart and die.

Appearances are now everything.

Just like in North Korea.

Welcome to our Kim Jong-un society.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

July 4th

On this July 4, let’s not forget what this holiday is all about. It’s about independence, not obedience.

Your Orwellian, warmongering federal government which sold its soul to Corporate America long ago would prefer to have you believe that you are being un-American when you stand up to their lies and expose the truth.

One such “American” who stood up to them was Julian Assange of Wikileaks. He pulled the curtain back and revealed who our elites truly are: greedy, corporate warmongers and murderers. Time and again Assange did what our co-opted, lackey mainstream media refused to do.

He embarrassed our evil government; and they in turn went to their ally, Great Britain, the country of King George, the enemies of our Founding Fathers, and threw him in one of their filthy prisons – Belmarsh Prison – where he sits today.

Although Julian Assange is Australian, he is truly American in spirit. Because he is rotting in Belmarsh Prison, at the behest of the United States, pending extradition to the United States, he should enjoy the privileges that our Bill of Rights guarantees.

The Sixth Amendment grants us the right to a speedy trial. Given Assange’s prolonged stay in Belmarsh Prison, it would be safe to conclude that our authorities couldn’t care less about the Bill of Rights.

That sounds par for the course.

When you blast a firecracker this July 4th, set one off for independence; set one off for a true American – Julian Assange.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Social View of History

Are you confused by current events? Are you perplexed as to why things are the way they are?

Do you get confused when politicians go against their campaign promises whether that candidate be a Democrat or a Republican?

If you do, it is probably because you believe in the social view of history.

Not surprisingly, the media and our elites promote the social view of history.

It’s an attractive concept, but it’s wrong.

What moves history and politicians is economics.

The social view of history is wrong.

The social view history states that it is people, their philosophies, their ideologies that move history and shape events. Consequently, much effort is spent to understanding people, cultures and their thinking.

This is reflected by our educational institutions that teach courses in social studies, not history.

The indoctrination into the social view of history is pervasive.

It begins in elementary school, then continues through high school and into college. It is perpetuated by the media.

What is never talked about to any large degree is the monetary view of history, or the economic view of history.

In the economic view of history, it is money and the acquisition of it by the elites that moves history.

This view is never taught in school, and is never talked about much by the media, because it would reveal who the real power in the world is.

If people started talking about economics to any large degree, then war might see the end of its existence as a ruling force in the world.

Wars are often seen and portrayed by the elites and the modern media as a natural consequence of two social forces coming up against each other.

Frequently these two social forces are portrayed as freedom destroyers versus freedom fighters, or wealthy capitalists versus poor working class peasants.

But what if it isn’t that way? What if that is a lie?

What if the wars are being fought because the elites on both sides want to justify their existence as well as make a pile of loot along the way?

What if the social view of history is wrong?

Let’s ask some questions.

Was the war in Vietnam fought to save democracy? Or was it fought because the US wanted to extend its hegemony over Southeast Asia for the purposes of oil and rubber extraction? Let’s not forget about palm oil. We have more palm oil in our bodies than blood.1

Was the war in Syria fought because the US truly desired freedom for the people in Syria? Or was it fought because the US and its ally Israel wanted to damage the Syria-Iran axis – the Syria-Iran axis being a threat to the western allies’ beachhead in the Middle East, that being Israel?

Did the US elites really care that Assad was oppressing his people? They didn’t care about the Saudi regime oppressing its people.

Was the war in Japan fought because the Japanese were oppressing the rights of other peoples in the Pacific Rim, or was it fought because the Japanese were fucking around with America’s rubber plantations? Or perhaps the vital assets that might one day be extracted from Indonesia? Or the oil in Sumatra?

How about the takeover of the Philippines by the US in the early part of the 20th century? Was that undertaken in order to improve the life for Filipinos? Or was it undertaken because the Philippines sits in an important geo-political location? Wouldn’t the Philippines be the ideal place to place bases from which to send bomber jets into countries in Southeast Asia – just in case they got any ideas that might fuck with our money?

The same can be asked of Cuba. Did the US really care about improving the life of Cubans? Or did the US want Cuba in order to exploit its citizenry so as to give us cheap sugar?

Was the Civil War in the United States fought to free the slaves? Or was it fought because the South after seceding was free to import finished goods from England thus creating competition for northern factories? Or maybe it was fought to free up cheap black labor for northern factories who could pay them “slave” wages? Or maybe it was fought to free up cheap black labor to act as scabs against emerging Northern unions?

Why was Jacobo Arbenz overthrown in Guatemala by the CIA? Because the US cared for the citizens of Guatemala who might live under communist oppression? Or was it fought in order to put down labor unions who might represent an economic threat to greedy corporate fruit importers like United fruit (Chiquita) and Standard Fruit (Dole)?

Why did we really fight in Afghanistan? Was it to get Al-Qaeda and bin Laden? Or was it to secure the vital minerals that are found there? Or maybe it was to make corporations a pile of money by fighting a war. We didn’t invade Pakistan. Isn’t that where bin Laden was ultimately found?

Let’s not forget about Iraq. Why did we go to war there? Wasn’t Saddam Hussein our former ally? Didn’t Rumsfeld once shake his hand? Did we really care about Saddam’s oppression of his people? We didn’t care for decades, so why now? Is it possible we went to war because Saddam Hussein was threatening the petrodollar? Or maybe we wanted to make corporations even more money by fighting a war?

Of course, the elites don’t want you asking too many questions. They would rather have you play the same idiotic game that is played out on national television every day of the week.

They want you to engage in the sporting match known as left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans, capitalists versus peasants.

The social view of history rapes you and removes you from the truth. While you debate and fight at the local level against your opponent be he or she Democrat or Republican, the corporate elites are laughing all the way to the bank.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

False Battles

If it’s one thing the elites are good at it’s framing false battles.

Framing false battles is essential to their survival.

If they didn’t frame false battles, you might start asking questions.

You asking questions is a major threat to their existence.

I don’t know who comes up with these false battles; I don’t know if they have a secret committee who does it, but they are very good at it.

Let’s give two examples.

The first example is the battle over the wall on the Rio Grande.

Trump is for the wall; Trump’s opponents are against the wall. The wall is promoted as a solution to fix immigration.

The wall is a bad idea but not because a wall can’t have effectiveness.

The entire subject of the wall is a bad idea because it diverts you away from the root cause of our immigration crisis which is Corporate America brutalizing the people of Central America – which has been going on for more than 100 years.

Focusing on the wall removes you from solving the problem.

And if some loose cannon happens to mention that we aren’t addressing the core problem, that loose cannon is dismissed as an impractical crank who is talking about long-term solutions. What is needed, we are told by the elites, is a solution right now.

Of course, the immediate solution won’t work, which is precisely the point. The elites don’t want the immediate solution to work because they want the problem to continue.

Operationally the immediate solution won’t work because the elites will ensure that it doesn’t work. They will ensure that it doesn’t work by not funding the wall.

Walls are expensive and they require commitment.

The second example is the assignment of blame of COVID-19 to a lab in Wuhan.

Let’s put aside for the moment the fact that a virus is easily transportable across borders and does not require any special equipment.

A virus isn’t transmitted into a country by a rocket booster.

The virus can be taken into a country by a traveler with a snotty nose. Or the virus can be transported in a small box of cough drops, or a bag of chips. It doesn’t take a week to fly to China.

Currently the battle to assign blame to a lab in Wuhan is being carried out in our modern media.

It’s the same senseless game that was played out with the wall.

By focusing on a lab in Wuhan, you are removed from directing your attention at the real problem, which is that scientists from the west, including Harvard, including the Broad Institute, which is a collaboration between an MIT and Harvard, have been working extensively with Chinese scientists for decades.

We train and work at each others institutions.

It is this collaboration which gave rise to our knowledge of virology, genetics and the tools to develop bio-weapons.

It is this collaboration in every sense of the word that gave rise to the ability to create bio-weapons.

Once this is understood it then becomes obvious that greater controls are needed in the scientific community.

Once we look at that collaboration we become more acutely aware that the scientists have gone too far.

It is they together who have created a weapon that is far more injurious than a nuclear weapon can ever be.

Their genetic tools including CRISPR have given them the ability to wipe humanity off the planet.

Of course, the elites do not want us to focus on that. So they give us a false battle. By focusing on Wuhan versus non-Wuhan, we remove ourselves from the truth.

That’s the whole point. Our leaders want to continue genetic research so that they can refine their bio-weapon capabilities.

Our leaders are sick.

Their profit-seeking ways have led them to develop even more diabolical ways of making money.

COVID-19 has opened up new vistas for them. They make a shitload of money off vaccines, and they get to wipe out small business competitors. They also were able to shut down vital areas of communication for their opponents, which is us. They were able to shut down churches, gyms, and restaurants.

It was beautiful for them.

What’s not to like?

Our leaders use two main techniques to make money: exploitation and war.

Through exploitation they can create slavery.

Through war they can steal assets and create the conditions for exploitation which again leads to slavery.

Genetic research and bio-weaponry lead to war.

Corporate America’s greed leads to continued exploitation of the people in Central America.

So to disguise their true intent, the elites need false battles.

They can’t have you asking too many questions.

Questions lead to the end of their game.

Of course, to get to that point, you have to ask yourself an essential question. Are our leaders good people who are misguided or stupid? Or are our leaders evil, sick people who have become intoxicated with money and power?

Once you choose the latter, there is no going back. You have crossed the Rubicon, and you know what needs to be done.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Rampant Inflation

Warning: This article may be damaging to the neurons of Polllyannas.

Why are the prices of goods going up?

Why does plywood require payment in gold?

If you read the main stream media outlets, you will find all sorts of technical answers regarding supply and demand.

All these answers are really good, and I would’ve believed in all of them many years ago.

Here’s the real reason why the price of goods are going up, and the Law of Parsimony dictates that my answer is the correct one.

The elites who control Corporate America desire the prices to go up so that they can maximize profits which will in turn drive the stock market even higher, which will make them even wealthier. 

They do this by creating artificial shortages.  Artificial shortages can be created in any number of ways:  shutting down plants, slowing down hiring, stockpiling of supplies.

Why do the elites want to maximize profits when they are already wealthy enough?

Because they’re sick pups who are addicted to money. 

There is another benefit to creating a shortage. 

The tougher the elites can make life for you, the weaker you become.  The weaker you become the more unable you are to resist the changes that they recommend.

Their goal is to radically change society.

As long as you believe that our leaders, and the corporate elites who control them, are good people, you will continue to believe in the traditional  explanations that are explained on mainstream media outlets.

Unfortunately, we don’t live in a decent world anymore. We live in an evil world where Corporate America is populated increasingly by individuals who attend elite schools where they are trained to believe in themselves as the masters of the universe.  

Welcome to neo-feudalism.

Your elite are sick people who gets an erection when they see you suffer.

Your suffering only reinforces their opinion of themselves as living gods.

Sorry for the reality check.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

JD Vance

JD Vance seems to be the candidate of the day.

He is running for a Senate seat in Ohio.

Suddenly he is everywhere on the media.

He is there on Tucker Carlson. He is there with Charlie Kirk.

These hosts pre-program you by announcing that JD Vance is one of the most insightful and smartest guys around.

How do they know that? Did they grow up with him? Have they worked side-by-side with him for decades?

Or are these hosts just part of Corporate America’s game?

JD Vance of course is the man who wrote the book Hillbilly Elegy which made him a lot of bucks.

JD Vance grew up in hillbilly country but then proceeded on to Yale University where he socialized with a different set of people.

He is positioned as a common man who made good, a common man who can lead the Republican party out of the wilderness.

What do I think of him?

Run away from him.

Run away from him as fast as you possibly can.

He is no common man.

He is no hillbilly anymore.

Perhaps he once was, but he’s not anymore.

He claims to be against corporate power, but it is corporate power and the people behind corporate power, the major universities, that put him where he is.

It was a major publishing house, HarperCollins, that sold 3 million copies of his book.

You don’t get those sales on the force of your own personality. It takes connections with major media to make those kinds of sales.

It’s a fact of life that people like what they know and that they often have to be given permission by the authorities to buy a book.

Authorities: This is a smart person; buy this book.

Sheep: Okay, authorities; I want to be smart too, so I will. I’ll place it on my shelf but never read it.

It was a major university, Yale, that accepted JD Vance into law school.

His wife, a fellow Yale graduate, clerked for Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts.

Usha Chilukuri, his wife, works for an extremely powerful law firm named Munger, Tolles, and Olson. The Munger in that firm is Charles Munger, a principal in the firm Berkshire Hathaway. Charles Munger is also a connected Harvard graduate and a buddy of Warren Buffett who is a buddy of Bill Gates.

JD Vance has access to major media.

He has the backing of Peter Thiel, another connected individual.

That’s a long way from Butcher Holler.

JD Vance owes his bones to corporate power.

He is corporate power.

This comes straight from Wikipedia:

“In 2017, he joined Revolution LLC, an investment firm founded by AOL cofounder Steve Case, as an investment partner, where he was tasked with expanding the “Rise of the Rest” initiative, which focuses on growing investments in under-served regions outside the Silicon Valley and New York City tech bubbles.

In 2019, he co-founded Narya Capital in Cincinnati, Ohio, with financial backing from Peter Thiel, Eric Schmidt, and Marc Andreessen. In 2020, Vance raised $93 million for Narya Capital.”

Does that sound like a hillbilly to you? Can you see the still and the moonshine?

See how far you get without that corporate power.

You won’t get very far at all.

Is it therefore likely that JD Vance will bite the hand that feeds him?

Unlikely.

Despite what comes out of his mouth, he will do what Corporate America tells him to do.

Actions speak louder than words.

If he is really opposed to corporate power, then why did he accept their book deal?

Why did he appear on Tucker Carlson?

Did Jesus go work for the Roman empire?

Did Jesus break bread with Julius Caesar?

Did Jesus work within the system?

No.

JD Vance is another puppet, controlled by Corporate America, to represent the common man for the best interest of Corporate America.

He will do nothing for the common man.

Run away from him.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

Please subscribe. Thank you.

Robert De Niro, Molecular Biologist

You’ll be happy to know that Robert De Niro has more sway over your family members than you do.

That’s right.

Robert De Niro has more influence on your family members than do you. I don’t care what your field is, Robert de Niro knows more.

Whether you are a baker, a candlestick maker, nuclear physicist, a doctor, or a molecular biologist, Robert knows more than do you.

More importantly your family members will take their cue from him.

Forget about all your years of training.

Forget about all the toil and sweat that you invested in becoming a master of your craft.

Robert De Niro knows more.

This is the consequence of our idiotic superstar culture.

You may be wondering now what I am talking about, and so I shall tell you.

As you may have already deduced from some of the columns I have written, I am a pediatrician.

I have been practicing pediatrics for over 38 years now.

It seems logical to me that I may have learned a thing or two.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic has begun, I have written more than just a few articles regarding COVID-19.

While communicating my opinions to the public at large, I have also communicated my opinions to my two sisters who, are family members, and who come from the same womb.

I do not like Dr. Fauci. I think Dr. Fauci is a devious liar who fronts for Corporate America.

Unlike the talking heads on television, I don’t need to rely on studies to justify my opinions because I am the study. I have worked in healthcare for over 3 1/2 decades. I don’t need a study in order to support what I say.

Now, you would think that this would carry some weight with my two sisters.

Let me assure you that it does not.

Just yesterday I received a group text from one of my sisters. She was talking about her grandson. She stated that she was taking care of her grandson who was sick. Then she related, in so many words, that he’d had a COVID-19 test and that it was negative. Then, in near morbid relief, she says: Thank God!

Now, I have told her numerous times that the risk of complications from COVID-19 to children is near zero.

Zero.

Her grandson, who has no underlying medical problems, has a near zero chance of having any complications from COVID-19.

And yet she is acting as if her grandson had dodged a LAWS missile.

Why would my sister react this way?

Why would she think that her grandson would be in danger?

I’ll tell you why.

Robert De Niro, molecular biologist. Robert De Niro, specialist in infectious disease.

This is the consequence of the idiotic superstar culture we have built up in the United States.

Your family members who come from the same womb are more likely to believe Robert De Niro, no matter what the issue is, than you in your field of expertise.

Robert De Niro has of course, no expertise in these various areas.

What Robert De Niro knows is acting, perhaps movie direction, and the business of making movies.

Of course, I could be speaking unfairly. Who knows the true skills of this amazing man.

Maybe Robert De Niro is a molecular biologist on the side. Maybe he has been shielding this from us. Maybe he has a secret lab in the basement of one of his mansions. Maybe he, under a pseudonym, has written highly technical papers on membrane receptors.

It’s possible.

But is it likely?

No.

Since it is not likely, and since the majority of the people in the United States now take their understanding of COVID-19 from Robert De Niro, what are the consequences of this?

You figure it out.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2021 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved