Joe versus the Machine

Why did the machine go after Joe McCarthy?

We have the benefit of hindsight. We have what Joe McCarthy didn’t. We can look back 70 years and see what has happened.

We see what the machine has done to America in the past seventy years.

We can see how the machine’s elite leaders from Harvard, Groton, Yale and Choate have sold America down the drain. We can see how they have betrayed the American worker.

What Joe McCarthy represented to these elites was an obstacle, a threat.

Joe McCarthy not only knew who they were and what they were, he exposed who and what they were.

In their minds Joe McCarthy had the audacity as a commoner to go up against the elites.

Not only did McCarthy go after the elites, he ridiculed them and embarrassed them.

He repeatedly exposed Dean Acheson, a Groton, Harvard dandy for what he was – a communist. He called Acheson the master of the half truth.

He in so many words called George C. Marshall a communist, which he was. McCarthy humiliated Marshall when he said that even if Marshall was dumb the law of averages would throw a few victories our way.

But the law of average did not throw a few victories our way because these men were communists.

You see, that was the machine’s plan all along – globalism, aka communism.

Their goal was to institute a totalitarian regime in the United States of America by breaking the people, by breaking the middle class, by printing up endless bucks to fight endless wars.

Moreover these elites loved money.

That’s why they went soft on communism.

They didn’t want to defeat communism; they wanted communism to be around so that they could make plenty of money for their warmongering corporations which by the way includes McDonald’s and like-minded firms who compete viciously to provide services for our men in the military.

America needs its enemies.

If Jesus had to come back to end communism and institute peace, they would’ve killed him. Actually, they did in a way. They killed JFK.

JFK was a Harvard, Choate guy who got woke. He betrayed the machine, so they got rid of him.

Every single war that these elites have fought since WWII then has been a soft war that has never been meant to be won.

They were totally happy for the Cold War to keep going. They made tons of money by providing military equipment to fight it. The Cold War made them more money than a real war.

They were totally happy for Vietnam to never end. In fact they didn’t want Vietnam to end. That’s why they decided to fight a war in a jungle. You can’t win a war in a jungle.

When Nixon began his efforts to stop the war, they got payback on Nixon by setting up Watergate through their thug agency, the CIA.

Incidentally, nearly all those Watergate burglars were either CIA or CIA fellow travelers.

Our elites who run the machine are totally happy for Afghanistan to never end. This is a war twenty years in the running. They’re making a fortune off this war.

Our elites are totally content to have a cold war with China. They don’t hate the communist regime there. They love the communist regime there. That’s their ideal model for the United States. Our elites and their machine are going to keep this cold war with China going until they finally transform the United States into a weakened police state totally focused on war and safety.

On a certain level, Joe McCarthy understood this.

He knew what would happen in the universities if the communists took control. You can watch the Army-McCarthy hearings. If you can sit through the insufferable scripted speech of the Harvard clown, Joseph Welch, you will hear McCarthy say that when the communists gain control of the universities they will shut free speech down.

McCarthy was right.

Joe McCarthy was what you call a muscular anti-communist. He was an old-fashioned anti-communist. He believed that you fight communism by defeating it.

That’s not what Dean Acheson believed. That’s not what Dwight Eisenhower believed. That’s not what George Marshall believed. That’s not what one of these stupid, clueless, elitist, Ivy League trained Presidents who have been in office for the past 30 years believed.

Joe McCarthy was an obstacle.

Joe McCarthy had to be defeated.

War to defeat communism?

Ha! Get real! Why would our elite pigs want to defeat communism when they can make more money by not defeating it?

And so to institute their money making, weak, anti-communist efforts they had to destroy Joe McCarthy. They had to humiliate him beyond comprehension.

What they did to Joe McCarthy is similar to what they’re doing to Julian Assange today.

Both men embarrassed the machine.

Both men exposed the machine.

Good.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2020 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

The Real Joseph McCarthy

Who did more damage to the United Stares of America: Dwight Eisenhower or Joseph McCarthy?

Dwight Eisenhower.

Dwight Eisenhower did tremendous damage to the United States – damage we are still trying to repair.

To be fair Dwight Eisenhower’s reach as President was greater than McCarthy’s.

Joseph McCarthy was only a Senator.

Ike was in a greater position to do more damage.

I bring this up because Joseph McCarthy has been demonized for the past seven decades.

Children are taught to hate him, to regard him as a demagogue.

Joseph McCarthy may have been vehemently anti-communist, but he was certainly no demagogue.

A demagogue is a person who appeals to the masses on emotion alone. A demagogue eschews rational thought.

Joe McCarthy’s case against George Marshall belies this.

Yes, Joe McCarthy was a populist. Yes he appealed to peoples anti-communist sentiments, but he was also a well read, well informed individual who could back up what he believed.

One could hardly call him uninformed. You may not agree with him, but he was not uninformed.

That he was informed, that he was able to back up what he said in painstaking detail is most likely the principal reason why his opponents painted him as a demagogue.

If you can’t win on facts, you have to resort to character assassination.

It’s difficult to imagine any of his opponents being able to present his mastery of detail.

And that is most likely the extent of the perceived damage that Joseph McCarthy inflicted upon America: he pointed out communists, more specifically totalitarians, enemies to the American dream.

Such criminality!

A communist in Joe McCarthy’s day was an enemy to the American dream.

The term communist had a different meaning in the 1940s and 50s. It was commonly accepted then that a communist took his or her orders from the Kremlin.

To be communist was to be subversive.

Joe McCarthy was hardly the only man who took up the fight against communism.

There existed at the time the Hollywood blacklist and the HUAC – House un-American Activities Committee – both commonly associated with McCarthy.

Well …

As neither an entertainer nor movie mogul Joe McCarthy had nothing to do with Hollywood and the Hollywood blacklist. As a US Senator Josephy McCarthy had nothing to do with the House un-American Activities Committee.

Joe McCarthy was primarily concerned with infiltration of communists within the higher levels of the United States government. And he was subsequently proven to be more right than his political opponents claim that he was not.

More generally he concerned himself with the overall direction of our foreign policy specifically with regard to George Catlett Marshall and the implementation of his Marshall plan.

Joseph McCarthy felt George C. Marshall was a tool of the communist party.

He points out his reasoning extensively in his published book: America’s Retreat From Victory: The Story Of George Catlett Marshall.

This raised the ire of Dwight Eisenhower who worked craftily, and immorally, behind the scenes to destroy Joseph McCarthy.

George C. Marshall was Eisenhower’s boss during World War II.

As we all know, Dwight Eisenhower won the day. Senator McCarthy was ultimately censured by the Senate. According to the left, McCarthy died in disgrace, although, to be fair, disgrace is not an objective property that can be measured.

But was Joseph McCarthy the bad guy

And what of his nemesis, Dwight Eisenhower? Was Dwight Eisenhower the good guy?

As I stated previously, Dwight Eisenhower did tremendous damage to the United States of America.

Not only did Dwight Eisenhower do immense damage to the United States of America, he proved conclusively through his actions that he was the ultimate globalist.

In the the 40s and 50s, the heyday of Senator McCarthy, people did not use the term globalist; they spoke of communists.

This is what Dwight Eisenhower was.

It’s important to understand that in our world today, or then, there exists little difference between a globalist, a communist, a crony capitalist and a fascist.

Totalitarianism is totalitarianism no matter what face it presents.

Dwight Eisenhower was groomed into the American globalist machine. He was Douglas MacArthur’s right hand man in the Philippines between the two wars. He became the commander of the armies during World War II.

Ike was the machine.

Ike warning us about the military industrial complex is the pot calling the kettle black.

Joe McCarthy embraced a different vision for America. He believed that America should support freedom loving people militarily. He rejected the idea of America being a welfare program for the world.

Joe McCarthy supported the Truman-Forrestal plan which was a more targeted, specific program to support anti-communists.

McCarthy felt that George C. Marshall hijacked that plan and watered it down thus making our anti-communist efforts less effective. He also felt that Marshall sold Chiang Kai-Shek, our commie-hater in China, down the river thus handing China over to Mao.

He was right.

Whereas Joe McCarthy’s anti-communism was muscular and designed to win, Ike’s anti-communism was weak and designed not to win. That was intentional. The goal was to create and foster an endless cold war that made uncountable amounts of cash for military contractors.

Which it did.

To stoke the need for more and more wars, Ike became the ultimate busybody. Not only did he support tremendous aid programs (spy programs really) for the world, he personally supported and approved the harmful interventions of the Central Intelligence Agency throughout the world.

Ike approved every nasty intervention that Alan Dulles conceived.

Ike was behind the overthrow of Mosaddegh of Iran in 1953 as well as the overthrow of Arbenz of Guatemala in 1954.

Ike laid the seeds of the Vietnam war.

Ike gave the go ahead to develop the ill-conceived Bay of Pigs invasion that ultimately took place in 1961 under JFK.

Ike also took the time to meddle in Africa and Indonesia. There was scarcely a place on the planet where Ike did not extend his globalist influence.

Many of the interventions that Ike undertook have come back to haunt us.

Correction: all of them have.

Our current enmity with Iran is directly connected to Ike’s installation of the Shah. The immigrants flooding across our southern border are directly related to Ike’s failure to give the laborers in Guatemala a fair stake in the game.

It’s fair to say that the modern American empire began under Dwight Eisenhower.

American war mongering accelerated under Dwight Eisenhower. Dwight Eisenhower laid the seeds of our modern police state.

The CIA grew under Dwight Eisenhower to become the tyrannical, out of control thug army of the ruling elite. This thug army conducts mayhem around the world to the benefit of the wealthy elites, not to the people of the United States of America.

The result of this interventionism is not a world of peace, but a world of war, constant war. To supply this war effort much money is printed up by the Federal Reserve. Ultimately this reduces the average American’s stake in the American dream as a disproportionate share of the newly printed money goes to the wealthy elite.

We now live in a full-time war economy thanks to Dwight Eisenhower.

This is the legacy of Dwight Eisenhower.

Joe McCarthy contrary to popular belief did very little damage to America and the world.

Of course, you can be forgiven for not believing such. History is written by the winners, in this case the globalists.

These globalists have given you a steady diet of lies about both Joseph McCarthy and Dwight Eisenhower for the past 70 years.

Sincerely,

Archer Crosley

Copyright 2020 Archer Crosley All Rights Reserved

John Birch and You

Many years ago a battle took place for the soul of the Republican Party.  On one side stood the John Birch Society, and on the other stood the Rockefeller Republicans. William F. Buckley, a Yale dandy, spoke for the Rockefeller Republicans. He, according to media elites, who, by the way, were and are controlled by the same people who controlled Buckley, represented the intellectual voice of reason against the media-portrayed evil, radical John Birchers.  The John Birchers were portrayed as horrible people, fringe lunatics, who felt that Communists were infiltrating America’s government at its highest levels.

The John Birch Society was set up after Senator Joe McCarthy’s death to continue the work of Senator McCarthy.  The people who joined felt that Senator McCarthy’s work, while zealous and perhaps overreaching in pointing out communists in our government, was valuable.

I remember a John Bircher coming to my school when I was a boy.  The school every year would hold a special events day where all sorts of people would come and talk.

I remember the John Bircher saying, “Let’s get the U.S. of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S.”  He wasn’t crazy.  He spoke very calmly.  He wore a nice suit.  He called for no rebellion.

Can anyone imagine a school allowing someone from the John Birch Society to speak to its students these days?

On that same day, one of my classmates dressed up like Adolf Hitler and delivered  one of Hitler’s speeches so that we could see what Hitler’s philosophy was all about. Can anyone imagine that taking place today?

Of course not. We now live in an age of political correctness where open discussion of ideas in any form is impossible.

Moreover, someone’s sensibilities might be offended. Yet in that day fifty years ago nobody’s sensibilities were offended.

It was accepted that free-speech was more important than offending someone.

So what happened in our society to change things?

What happened was that William F. Buckley won the day against the John Birch Society.

Let’s not be coy.  William F. Buckley was a Rockefeller Republican, a phony conservative and a crony capitalist.  His father was the founder of Pantepec Oil.  William F. Buckley was a former CIA agent posing as a deep thinker.

In reality, he was still a CIA agent, and his mission, whether he was aware or not, was to hijack a political party and its followers.

There was a legitimate conservative movement within the Republican Party.  The John Birch society was part of  that conservative movement. They believed fervently that communists had infiltrated the United States government. And guess what?

They were right.

When the John Birch Society faded away – thanks to pseudo-conservatives like William F. Buckley, and his like-minded friends and Yale dandies, Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush – an important counterbalance to centralization of power was lost. What ensued was the easy co-opting of the educational system of the United States of America.

It became a piece of cake for the internationalists to demonize Joe McCarthy, to make up lies about him. There were so many lies told about Joe McCarthy that the regular people of America couldn’t even begin to approach the truth about him.

The internationalists accomplished this through the slur of McCarthyism.  So I guess two wrongs make a right.  Or were two wrongs made?  Did Joe McCarthy slander people?  Time will tell.

Today, many people think that Joe McCarthy had something to do with the Hollywood blacklist. Yet Joe McCarthy had nothing to do with the blacklisting of Hollywood actors and directors. Joe McCarthy was not an actor. Joe McCarthy was not a director.  Joe McCarthy was not a producer.  Joe McCarthy was not a mogul. 

Sorry, Hollywood, you blacklisted your own, all on your own, thank you.

Many others think that Joe McCarthy had something to do with the House Un-American Activities Committee. Do you?

Well, as it turns out, as a U.S. Senator, Joe McCarthy had absolutely nothing to do with the House Un-American Activities Committee. That is a completely separate branch of the legislature.

Yes, but how about all the people that Joe McCarthy accused of being communists?  The mainstream media assured us that such claims were baseless? 

Well, let’s just say that the Venona Project, secret intercepts of Russian cables from Moscow to their operatives in the United States, which are slowly being decoded, are slowly but surely vindicating Joe McCarthy.

There were communists all over our government. They are still there today. They have done their job quite well as you are now living in a socialist stare.  Communism is right around the corner.

With political correctness thriving, I’d say we are living in it.

There is very little difference between communism, crony socialism, crony capitalism and fascism.

What’s the difference between a quasi-governmental AT&T monopoly and the ministry of communication? Nothing.

Too big to fail means of course that you are too big; it also means that you’re part of the government.  

Since too big to fail is now official government policy, we’re in for a long fight. 

That’s what the John Birch Society, those fringe lunatics, tried to warn us about.

 

www.thejfklie.com

 

Christian Goals

Christianity‘s vision is often misguided.

Christianity is about your individual salvation.

Christ wants to know what you are going to do as an individual.

Christ wants to know how you are going to treat other people.

What Christ doesn’t care about is what we are going to do in the Middle East or the Ukraine.

There is no “we” in Christ’s message.

Christ speaks to you as an individual.

Yes, I understand the reference to “our” and “us” in the Lord’s Prayer. Many pastors and theologians have seized upon these words as tools to marshal Christians toward collective action.

Many pastors believe that Christ does not exist without the Church.

I disagree.

Christ was not a commie. These words “us’ and “our” in the Lord’s Prayer are literary tools not calls for collective action.

A group is not a person and thus has no sense of shame or guilt. Without a sense of shame or guilt, a group has no need for God or God’s forgiveness and so acts accordingly.

Now, in today’s modern world we have many preachers who take Christ’s message and evangelize for war.

I must’ve missed the lesson in my Sunday school class where Jesus implored for us to go out into the world and beat the shit out of people.

These ministers work with the CIA and rev their followers up for war.

They cozy up to politicians at prayer breakfasts.

They agitate for war.

As if we haven’t had one for the past 15 years.

The basis for this warmongering is Christ’s missionary zeal.

The logic, I suppose, is that because Christ preached while walking from town to town we are to do the same.

How can we sit back and do nothing, zealots ask, as they point to “primitive” cultures.

Look at the poverty, they scream.

And their backward way of life, they add.

The misery is heartbreaking, and something must be done.

Christianity is then viewed as a fighting religion.  

The goal then is to force our better, superiorChristian way of life upon the barbarian beast.

And what this has led to is nonstop American warmongering overseas for over one hundred years.

The path we take is false.

Christians spread their faith best by practicing it as individuals, not by cramming their faith down the throats of the nonbeliever with an army.

There is no “we” in Christianity.

By joining a group, even a Christian one, I forfeit my morality to the group leader who has been seduced and excited by Corporate America through private visits with the President, flights on Air Force One, and the other dog biscuits of Empire.

But if I turn away and ask what I should do as an individual, then the solution reveals itself. The group leader loses power and our leadership unable to sell war decides to work with other nations rather than exploit them.

As Jesus said, “You are the light of the world.”

True Christianity thus reveals itself.



www.thejfklie.com

The Eternal Dance

This is what Pope Francis said:

“A Christian cannot be an anti-Semite; we share the same roots. It would be a contradiction of faith and life. Rather, we are called to commit ourselves to ensure anti-Semitism is banned from the human community.”

Here’s my question: If a Christian goes to church is that an anti-Semitic act?

Are Christians harming the sensibilities of Jews by attending a Sunday service?

You may laugh, but I guarantee you there are people who believe just that.  In short time, they will express such.

There is a modern trend to homogenize Judaism and Christianity – to link them as brothers in arms.

Supporting this is the phrase Judeo-Christian nation. We hear political leaders use this term all the time.

One would think that Christianity is only a step away from Judaism philosophically.

But it is not.

Christianity represents a radical departure from Judaism.

Radical.

In essence, Judaism is a hierarchical religion where rules, interpretations and power flow from the top down much like its atheistic sister religion communism.

Christianity in its Protestant form is nothing of the sort.

And that is the brand of Christianity of which I speak here.

Christianity works from the bottom up beginning with a personal relationship with Jesus who functions as God’s interlocutor on Earth. Christianity has few rules other than doing unto others as you would have others do unto you.

Whereas Judaism emphasizes works, Christianity most decidedly puts the kibosh on works never better illustrated than by Jesus renouncing a crown.  By doing so, Jesus is saying to us that there is little value in titles, money and awards.  What Jesus preaches is process.   If the process is bad, says Jesus, what’s the point?

When it comes to the afterlife, Jews believe that your presence is manifested through the memories of those who are alive.   I can not disagree with this logic.  What this promotes, though, in this life is a drive to produce as big an impact as possible.  Unfortunately for us, man is stupid, and so what results is a piling up of titles, awards and possessions.  Man is of simple thought, not smart enough to think qualitatively – to equate a kind word with a skyscraper. 

Christians emphasize an afterlife whose entrance can not be gained through works alone.  One must accept Christ and what Christ teaches which is most decidedly not embodied by  owning the biggest house on the block.  What this produces is a flattening of wealth distribution from the bottom up.  We are more financially equal not because a politburo or a government dictates such but because we choose not to be so accumulative in the first place.  Enough is enough.

And so what we have is an impasse. We have two radically different approaches to life.  Yet people are told that the religions are similar, on a continuum, as if one was walking in a mall from Spencer Gifts to Ann Taylor Loft.

But they are not.

Not only are they not similar, they represent existential threats to each other.  They are natural enemies.

In time one must destroy or weaken the other in order to survive.

It’s just the way it is.

It’s not a wish; it’s reality.  And all the hugging, posturing and beautiful language in the world can not change this.

Christianity is a threat to Judaism because it is an easier more open platform to adopt. As such, for Judaism to survive, to stave off death, it must necessarily weaken Christianity. 

Which it does through Hollywood and the government.

Judaism says that it does not desire to convert; oh, but it does. It does so through secular means.

Socialism is secular Judaism.  The politburo replaces the Sanhedrin.  The oppressive bureaucracy of the socialist state replaces Jewish Law.  Abstruse Marxist reasoning replaces the abstruse reasoning of Jewish theologians.  Political correctness replaces Kosher law and thought.

In the past century as the Jews have become more successful, they have  prosecuted their values  through Hollywood and the government.  There is nothing immoral or illegal about this, by the way.  This is the way the system works.  You make the money; you get to spend it how you see fit.

Consequently, millions upon millions of former Christians have been converted into secular Jews (socialists and communists) only they don’t know it.

One can barely recognize America as a Christian nation anymore. People are now focused on getting rich, going to a prestigious school, becoming famous, winning awards, having their own clothing line.

A Wikipedia page would be nice.

Does this sound like Jesus renouncing a crown?

Likewise, our society has become less tolerant of people’s faults.  Routinely we hear the media call for someone’s resignation for the most minor of infractions – usually a violation of liberal orthodoxy.  Slogans like “failure is not an option” are now commonplace in the schools.

This new intolerance is the God of the Old Testament, not the new. This is not the way of Jesus.

Jesus said let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

In the world of Jesus, failure must be an option. People must forgive others as well as themselves.

But they often can not because they have been conned into turning away from the principles that Christ teaches.

And so they struggle vainly for the bucks  and glory; and when they don’t get it because  there are only so many spots at the top, they cannot forgive themselves.  Many kill themselves; many turn to drugs and alcohol.

One girl from an Ivy League school who found herself struggling academically threw herself off a parking garage.

Is this the world we want?

Compounding the stress of trying to be “someone,” is the stress of having to conform to a dizzying array of politically correct behaviors and thoughts.

Politically correct thought and behavior are not Christian in scope, but Jewish.  

It is Judaism (as well as Christianity gone wrong)  that attempts to place a carapace upon human behavior and thought.  It is Judaism that mandates conformity to the dictates of an elite Sanhedrin or the elite musings of Jewish theologians.  

Think about it:  Who is deciding what is acceptable but today’s secular equivalent of the Sanhedrin?

Christianity will have none of this for Christianity works from the inside out.  Christ only asks that you not unreasonably judge others for the silly things that people say and do.

And so we sit at an impasse.

We have two religions vying for supremacy. Only one can win.  And only one will win.

Despite the rhetoric there will never be any “coming together.”  This is a myth prosecuted by the human potential movement.

Peace is only transitory.  

Yet lies persist.  And media people and religious leaders who should know better continue to promote the myth that Judaism and Christianity are brothers holding hands happily skipping through the woods.  

Sorry, Charlie.

Judaism and Christianity are no more alike because they share a common history than a bicycle is like an airplane because Orville and  Wilbur Wright built both of them.

So, let’s return to the initial question: Will Christians going to church be seen as an anti-Semitic act?

In time it will be because it is.